And we have successfully proven the integration by parts formula!

AI Thread Summary
The integration by parts formula is successfully proven under the condition that f(0) = g(0) = 0. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply integration by parts twice, first with f(x) and g''(x), and then with f'(x) and g'(x). Key steps include correctly identifying u and dv, and managing the signs throughout the process. The final expression confirms the relationship between the integrals and the boundary terms. This methodical approach leads to the desired formula, demonstrating the integration by parts technique effectively.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
If f(0)=g(0)=0, show that

\int _0 ^a f(x) g ^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx = f(a) g^{\prime} (a) - f^{\prime} (a) g (a) + \int _0 ^a f ^{\prime \prime} (x) g (x) \: dx

I know I need to use integration by parts, but I'm having a hard time figuring out the right choice of u and dv. What I do know is the following:

\underbrace{\int _0 ^a f(x) g ^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx}_{\int _0 ^a u \: dv} = \underbrace{f(a) g^{\prime} (a) - f^{\prime} (a) g (a)}_{\left. uv \right] _0 ^a} + \underbrace{\int _0 ^a f ^{\prime \prime} (x) g (x) \: dx}_{-\int _0 ^a v \: du}

Also, the closest I get to \left. uv \right] _0 ^a so far is

\frac{d}{dx} \left[ f(x) g(x) \right] = f(x) g^{\prime} (x) + f^{\prime} (x) g (x) \Longrightarrow \left. \frac{d}{dx} \left[ f(x) g(x) \right] \right|_0 ^a = f(a) g^{\prime} (a) + f^{\prime} (a) g (a)

but, as you can see, that doesn't work because of a sign.

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thiago j,

Since you have g'' and f on the right, and g and f'' on the left, you have to integrate by parts twice. The first time your integrand you end up with on the right will be f'g'. Then integrate again and it will become f''g. Meanwhile you will have created two of the uv terms in front. If you're careful with the signs they'll work out just like the answer that's given.

One more hint. Do it with indefinite interals first to reduce the amount of stuff you have to keep track of at a time.
 
Thank you for the tips!

\int _0 ^a f(x) g^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx

Integrating by parts gives

u = f(x) \Rightarrow \frac{du}{dx} = f ^{\prime} (x) \Rightarrow du = f ^{\prime} (x) \: dx
dv = g^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx \Rightarrow v = g^{\prime} (x)


\int _0 ^a f(x) g^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx = \left. f(x) g^{\prime} (x) \right] _0 ^a - \int _0 ^a f^{\prime} (x) g^{\prime} (x) \: dx
\int _0 ^a f(x) g^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx = f(a) g^{\prime} (a) - \int _0 ^a f^{\prime} (x) g^{\prime} (x) \: dx

which implies we need to find

\int _0 ^a f^{\prime} (x) g^{\prime} (x) \: dx

Integrating by parts gives

w = f ^{\prime} (x) \Rightarrow \frac{dw}{dx} = f ^{\prime \prime} (x) \Rightarrow dw = f ^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx
dk= g^{\prime} (x) \: dx \Rightarrow k = g(x)


\int _0 ^a f^{\prime} (x) g^{\prime} (x) \: dx = \left. f^{\prime} (x) g (x) \right] _0 ^a - \int _0 ^a f^{\prime \prime} (x) g(x) \: dx
\int _0 ^a f^{\prime} (x) g^{\prime} (x) \: dx = f^{\prime} (a) g (a) - \int _0 ^a f^{\prime \prime} (x) g(x) \: dx

Thus, we obtain

\int _0 ^a f(x) g^{\prime \prime} (x) \: dx & = f(a) g^{\prime} (a) - f^{\prime} (a) g (a) + \int _0 ^a f^{\prime \prime} (x) g(x) \: dx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top