Angle between two refraction angles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle between two beams of blue and red light as they refract through a specific glass with different indices of refraction. The indices provided are 1.640 for blue light and 1.605 for red light, with both beams incident at 30.0°. The main confusion arises from the unnecessary attempt to find the indices of refraction again, as they are already given. The correct approach involves applying Snell's law to determine the internal angles for each color, allowing for the calculation of the angle between the two beams. Ensuring the calculator is set to degrees and verifying intermediate answers are also emphasized for accuracy.
goWlfpack
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A certain kind of glass has an index of refraction of 1.640 for blue light of wavelength 440 nm and an index of 1.605 for red light of wavelength 670 nm. If a beam containing these two colors is incident at an angle of 30.0° on a piece of this glass, what is the angle between the two beams inside the glass?



Homework Equations



wavelength in vacuum/ waveleangth = n
(Sin theta)n - (sin theta2) n2


The Attempt at a Solution



I first tried to find the new index of refractice (n) for each wavemength in air. Then i used that to find each angle... then found the difference between them. any ideas where i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you trying to find the indices of refraction for each color of light? They are given to you in the problem.
 
goWlfpack said:

Homework Statement


A certain kind of glass has an index of refraction of 1.640 for blue light of wavelength 440 nm and an index of 1.605 for red light of wavelength 670 nm. If a beam containing these two colors is incident at an angle of 30.0° on a piece of this glass, what is the angle between the two beams inside the glass?

Homework Equations



wavelength in vacuum/ waveleangth = n
(Sin theta)n - (sin theta2) n2

The Attempt at a Solution



I first tried to find the new index of refractice (n) for each wavemength in air. Then i used that to find each angle... then found the difference between them. any ideas where i went wrong?

I think you are making this too hard:
One difficulty with these types of problems is that they give you the wavelength of the two different colors (400nm and 600 nm). Generally, the wavelengths in a problem are always stated as vacuum (or air) wavelength (the difference here is negligible because the index of air is ~1). Due to dispersion (a different response from the material to the incoming E/M light wave of different frequency/color), the speed of light propagation in a material can depend on its frequency/color. This is represented by different indices of refraction for the different colors. This causes the light to spread out in colors when it enters a dispersive material (like glasses)... because the different indices cause different angles of refraction.

Because at this point you don't care about the wavelength in the material, only the angle, your second equation suffices:

(Sin theta)n - (sin theta2) n2
(It's called "Snell's law".. and note, there's no wavelength in this equation at all!)

Here theta would be the angle at which the light strikes the glass (relative to the normal), n would be the index of refraction of air. theta 2 is the angle relative to the normal of the refracted beam inside the glass, and n would be the index of refraction for that color. You should know all but theta2, the internal angle for each beam. Once you find the internal angles for each beam, you can find the angle between them (as you indicated).

Also check you intermediate answers: Which beam will be refracted more: Blue are red? Do your answers correspond?

If things look funny, make sure you have your calculator set on "degrees," or that you've converted your angle correctly. It's easy to forget this. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top