Angle for Maximum Range in Projectile Motion with Drag Equation?

fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is Kibble & Berkshire 3.8, http://books.google.com/books?id=0a...kibble berkshire&pg=PA68#v=onepage&q&f=false" is a link. (The problem is on page 68. Equation 3.17, referred to in the problem, is on page 53.)

I figured out the first part (finding the first-order approximation of the range), but I'm having problems figuring out the angle for maximum range.

Edit: I originally said it was problem 3.7, but it's really problem 3.8 I'm having problems with. The link is still valid.

The Attempt at a Solution


The velocity is v^2 = u^2 + w^2 (see page 53). The angle we're looking for is \alpha = arctan(w/u).

It seems like one should be able to write the expression for x in terms of v, and find the extrema of that function. However it is impossible to write x solely in terms of v (and some constants). Also, I don't really understand the hint. Halp!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can certainly express u and w in terms of v and \alpha. You can then extremize x with respect to \alpha. As for the hint, if you keep all terms in \alpha, you arrive at a cubic equation for \sin\alpha, which is a bit unwieldy. However, any way that I try to use the hint, I'm always off by a numerical factor from their result for \cos 2\alpha. Maybe you'll have better luck.
 
Still stuck on this problem.

I can write, using the expression for x given in the link and the relation between u,v,w, and alpha

x = \frac{2}{g} v^2 \sin\alpha \cos\alpha - \frac{8 \gamma}{3 g^2} v^3 \cos\alpha \sin^2\alpha

Maximizing this function wrt. to v doesn't lead to the desired answer (I'm omit the details).

So I try to use the hint("in the term containing \gamma, you may use the zeroth-order approximation for the angle") Ok, so for \alpha small, the zeroth order approx. of cos(\alpha) is 1 and the zeroth-order approx. of sin^2(\alpha) is ... 0? This doesn't make sense. And clearly it leads nowhere.

Maybe I'm supposed to leave the sin^2 term alone. If I try that, I still don't get the desired answer.

Any insight into how to solve this problem is appreciated.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top