Angle of twist from in-plane displacements in FEA

AI Thread Summary
Solid elements in finite element analysis (FEA) typically lack rotational degrees of freedom, making it challenging to directly measure the angle of twist from torsion simulations. However, in-plane displacement values can be utilized to calculate the angle of twist by dividing the displacement magnitude by its distance from the center of the cross-section. This method has been validated for elliptical bars, yielding results that closely match analytical values. While this approach works well for symmetric cross-sections like rectangles and hexagons, it may not be suitable for asymmetric shapes such as C or L sections, which require alternative methods for accurate calculations. Understanding the geometry and ensuring proper discretization are crucial for minimizing errors in these analyses.
FEAnalyst
Messages
348
Reaction score
149
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate the angle of twist from in-plane displacements?
Hi,

solid elements used in FEA don't have rotational DOFs so normally it's not possible to read the angle of twist from simulation involving torsion. Some programs allow the transformation of results to cylindrical coordinate system but it's not always the case. From what I've heard, it's possible to use in-plane displacement values to determine the angle of twist. However, I'm not sure how to actually do it. Here's an example of an elliptical bar subjected to torsion:
- X displacements:
U1.PNG

- Y displacements:
U2.PNG


How can I calculate the angle of twist from these displacement values? Or maybe it's not enough and nodal coordinates are needed as well?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The maximum and minimum numbers in the color bars are the maximum X or Y displacement at the node with the maximum displacement. This is shown in the sketch below:
Ellipse.jpg

Note that the maximum Y displacement is exactly twice the maximum X displacement, and that the X dimension is twice the Y dimension of the ellipse. Also, the magnitudes of the positive X & Y displacements are equal to the magnitudes of the negative X & Y displacements. This shows that the total displacement is a rotation about the center of the ellipse. Any one of the displacements divided by its distance from the center gives the rotation angle in radians.

All of this is helped by the discretization which puts nodes at the extreme X and Y coordinates. Larger elements with nodes away from those points would add some error due to the lack of nodes at the extreme X and Y points on the ellipse.

It's easier to see this if the displacement plots are shown with deformed geometry.
 
jrmichler said:
Any one of the displacements divided by its distance from the center gives the rotation angle in radians.
Thank you very much. Let's take the displacement of the node on the left. The magnitude is ##0.03882 \ mm## and the semi-major axis is ##100 \ mm## so the angle should be ##0.0003882 \ rad##. And the analytical value is ##0.000394 \ rad## so the results agree really well.

However, what about other types of cross-sections? Could I use the same method (nodal displacement divided by its distance from the center) for any other cross-section like rectangular for example ?
 
Last edited:
You should be able to if it has appropriate symmetry. Rectangular, hexagon, or hollow round tube should be good, while a C-channel would require more effort.
 
jrmichler said:
You should be able to if it has appropriate symmetry. Rectangular, hexagon, or hollow round tube should be good, while a C-channel would require more effort.
Right, asymmetric sections like C or L (probably also T) will be problematic here. Do you know how to calculate the angle of twist from in-plane displacements in such cases? Maybe different method should be used.
For example:
- cross-section:
section.JPG

- X displacement:
L section 1.JPG

- Y displacement:
L section 2.JPG

And the analytical result is ##0.0257936508 \ rad## in this case.
 
X displacement divided by distance from zero X displacement should be fairly close if the cross section maintains its shape. Similar for Y. Look at the deformed geometry plot, try some calculations, and find out.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top