Angle to lift a body off the surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum angle α at which a rectangular box begins to lift off a horizontal surface when pulled by a rope with a force T, considering friction. Participants explore the relationship between torque, force components, and the box's moments of inertia, emphasizing the need to analyze both horizontal and vertical forces. The key equations include the balance of forces in the x-direction and the torque about the box's corner, leading to the conclusion that the angle can be expressed in terms of the box's dimensions and the friction coefficient. Clarifications are made regarding the role of friction in torque calculations, with a consensus that friction does not contribute to the torque about the lifting edge. The conversation highlights the importance of geometric relationships and the correct application of static equilibrium principles in solving the problem.
Totally
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A rectangular box is being pulled by a rope with a force T on a horizontal surface, with a friction coefficient μ. What is the minimum angle α at which it will lift of the surface? See attached image.

Homework Equations


\begin{equation*}
\tau = rF\sin\alpha
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
F_y=F_g-Tsin\alpha
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
F_x=F_f-Tcos\alpha
\end{equation*}

The Attempt at a Solution


OK, I am slightly confused here. Should I look at this as a torque problem where the y component of force T will cause rotation around the lower left corner until the angle the box makes with the horizontal is equal to the angle of the force T? In the key the answer is expressed as
\begin{equation*}
\alpha=tan^{-1}(\frac{a}{b}+\frac{1}{\mu})
\end{equation*}
 

Attachments

  • Angle.png
    Angle.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a nice question :)
I solved it using moments and i got your answer.
Start by framing equations.
The body should not move horizontally, so get 1 equation involving friction.
then
you just need one more equation, which you can get by equating the moments(3), give it a try,
 
Okay, so if the body is not moving horizontally, the cosine component of the force T has to be equal to the force of friction, meaning
\begin{equation*}
\mu mg=Tcos\alpha
\end{equation*}
The moments of inertia of the rectangle at the corner has to be
\begin{equation*}
I=\frac{m(a^2+b^2)}{3}
\end{equation*}
The other moment of inertia I can see is where the (rope?) connects to the box but I don't have the length of the rope so I'm assuming I can use the moment of inertia of the box at the edge, which would be
\begin{equation*}
I=[\frac{mb^2}{3}+\frac{ma^2}{12}] sin\alpha
\end{equation*}
Is sinα correct here? I don't see how else moments would be equal
The force in y direction is converted to torque (have alpha already, I'll let angular acceleration be varphi) so
\begin{equation*}
F_g-Tsin\alpha=I\varphi
\end{equation*}
Now do I try to define T from the friction equation in x direction?
 
Totally said:
Okay, so if the body is not moving horizontally, the cosine component of the force T has to be equal to the force of friction, meaning
\begin{equation*}
\mu mg=Tcos\alpha
\end{equation*}
The moments of inertia of the rectangle at the corner has to be
\begin{equation*}
I=\frac{m(a^2+b^2)}{3}
\end{equation*}
The other moment of inertia I can see is where the (rope?) connects to the box but I don't have the length of the rope so I'm assuming I can use the moment of inertia of the box at the edge, which would be
\begin{equation*}
I=[\frac{mb^2}{3}+\frac{ma^2}{12}] sin\alpha
\end{equation*}
Is sinα correct here? I don't see how else moments would be equal
The force in y direction is converted to torque (have alpha already, I'll let angular acceleration be varphi) so
\begin{equation*}
F_g-Tsin\alpha=I\varphi
\end{equation*}
Now do I try to define T from the friction equation in x direction?
You don't need moments of inertia. There's no acceleration here, it's effectively a statics question. Moment, as mentioned by Suraj, is just force times perpendicular distance.
 
Ah, he meant torque, as moment of force :sorry:

So I have my equation to keep things stationary in x direction
\begin{equation*}
\mu mg=Tcos\alpha
\end{equation*}
And the torque
\begin{equation*}
\tau=bTsin\alpha
\end{equation*}
(Am I correct in saying r=b?)
Is torque in this case acting against Fg? I've tried using that and then plugging it in the friction equation, but, naturally I'm missing a and it looks quite different:
\begin{equation*}
tan\alpha=\frac{1}{\mu b}
\end{equation*}
 
The force T has vert and horiz components, and both components contribute a moment about the lower left corner of the block.
 
:sorry:If I understand Nascent correctly, then I wasn't supposed to add sin component to the torque. I was under the assumption that displacement vector has to be perpendicular to the force, but now that I think about it, it simply makes the torque maximum. If I don't have to worry about 90°, then the displacement vector from axis of rotation to the force applied will be
\begin{equation*}
r={\frac{1}{2}a}^2+b^2
\end{equation*}
and torque will be left with just
\begin{equation*}
\tau=rT
\end{equation*}
acting against mg?
 
When evaluating the moment of a force (or a component of a force) about a point you need the perpendicular distance from the point in question to the line of action of that force (or component).
 
I don't see how can I make a right angle here between the force along the rope and the point, unless I'm imagining extension of a rope, in which case I'm lost at how I would calculate it only knowing the hypotenuse. What am I missing here?
 
  • #10
Totally said:
I don't see how can I make a right angle here between the force along the rope and the point, unless I'm imagining extension of a rope
That is exactly what you must do, extend the line of action of the force until you can form the right-angle. If you do it this way, the problem becomes an exercise in geometry because you need to determine that perpendicular distance in terms of a, b, and angle alpha.

Alternatively, you can resolve the force T into its vert and horiz components and calculate moments about that corner point due to these two components.I worked this problem both ways, the answers agree, but the second method was less complicated.
 
  • #11
Totally said:
my equation to keep things stationary in x direction
μmg=Tcosα​
it should be ( mg - vertical component of the force) µ
The other equation is through moments.
Use the Centre of mass, vertical and horizontal component of T at the point of attachment. All these can be got by the perpendicular distance in terms of a and b.
 
  • #12
I've got my r expression, seems to check out with random values if I check by graphing
\begin{equation*}
r=b\tan\alpha-\frac{a}{2}
\end{equation*}
NascentOxygen said:
If you do it this way, the problem becomes an exercise in geometry because you need to determine that perpendicular distance in terms of a, b, and angle alpha.
If I'm doing it this way, where does the friction play into this? Is there "frictional torque" around the corner?
 
  • #13
Totally said:
If I'm doing it this way, where does the friction play into this? Is there "frictional torque" around the corner?
No. Friction acts at the corner, and by taking moments about that point any force whose line of action passes through that point contributes no torque. So your equation ΣM does not involve friction.

However, the equation for ΣF still does.
 
  • #14
x and y components of T are Tcosα and Tsinα. As haru said, no acceleration, which yealds
\begin{equation*}
F+Tsin\alpha-mg=0
\end{equation*}
Which gives maximum static friction as
\begin{equation}
\mu(mg-Tsin\alpha)
\end{equation}
Consistent with Suraj, yay.
Then in x
\begin{equation*}
Tcos\alpha-\mu(mg-Tsin\alpha)=0
\end{equation*}
And the torque
\begin{equation}
\tau=[b\tan\alpha-\frac{a}{2}]T
\end{equation}
What else am I missing?
 
  • #15
The leading edge of the block is about to lift off the surface, indicating the net torque about the trailing edge = ??
 
  • #16
Totally said:
I've got my r expression, seems to check out with random values if I check by graphing
\begin{equation*}
r=b\tan\alpha-\frac{a}{2}
\end{equation*}
Draw a large figure, check this carefully.
 
  • #17
NascentOxygen said:
The leading edge of the block is about to lift off the surface, indicating the net torque about the trailing edge = ??
If there is no angular acceleration, then the net torque is zero; its used to overcome friction and mg, right?

That is embarrassing, but seems I fixed it

\begin{equation*}
r=b\sin\alpha-0.5a\cos\alpha
\end{equation*}
 

Attachments

  • r.png
    r.png
    129.8 KB · Views: 486
  • #18
Is that image you attached really 600kB?! I'm not about to click on it.

You can probably reduce it to under 20kB without significant deterioration, and that way it won't chew through mobile reader's download allowance.
 
  • #19
Totally said:
If there is no angular acceleration, then the net torque is zero; its used to overcome friction and mg, right?

That is embarrassing, but seems I fixed it

\begin{equation*}
r=b\sin\alpha-0.5a\cos\alpha
\end{equation*}
Totally, i honestly feel you're complicating this.
I highly recommend, you try the other method, of you have not.
The T you have, you could have got the components which you have
Totally said:
x and y components of T are Tcosα and Tsinα.
then gét their distance from the point of contact (left down). then get the equation for moments.
 
  • #20
Suraj M said:
Totally, i honestly feel you're complicating this.
Totally has got through the hard part, the remainder is no more complex than the alternative, so may as well finish this, now.
 
  • #21
Totally said:
hat is embarrassing, but seems I fixed it

\begin{equation*}
r=b\sin\alpha-0.5a\cos\alpha
\end{equation*}
That's what I calculated.
 
  • #22
NascentOxygen said:
so may as well finish this, now.
Sure,
just a suggestion :smile:
 
Back
Top