Angular Acceleration and a grindstone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a grindstone that starts at 126 rad/s and makes 20 revolutions in 8 seconds. The calculations consistently yield an angular acceleration of approximately -27.57 rad/s², which does not match any of the provided answer choices. Participants suggest that the discrepancy might stem from a mistake in the question itself, particularly regarding the use of the 1/2 factor in the angular displacement formula. They note that the closest answer, 13.79 rad/s², appears to be half of their calculated value, indicating a potential error in the formulation of the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of careful equation application in physics problems.
bamalam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
HELP! I keep getting a solution that is not part of the choices. Where am I messing up?

A grindstone, originally rotating at 126 rad/s undergoes a constant angular acceleration so that it makes 20.0 rev in the first 8.00s. What is the angular acceleration?


a) 0.313 rad/s2
b) 0.625 rad/s2
c) 2.50 rad/s2
d) 1.97 rad/s2
e) 13.79 rad/s2

My Calculations:
20rev*2PIrad/rev = 40PI rad = theta
t = 8 sec
wo = 126 rad/sec

theta = wo*t+1/2*a*t^2
40PI = 126*8+.5*a*8^2
40PI-126*8 = 32a
a = -27.57 rad/sec^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bamalam said:
HELP! I keep getting a solution that is not part of the choices. Where am I messing up?

A grindstone, originally rotating at 126 rad/s undergoes a constant angular acceleration so that it makes 20.0 rev in the first 8.00s. What is the angular acceleration?


a) 0.313 rad/s2
b) 0.625 rad/s2
c) 2.50 rad/s2
d) 1.97 rad/s2
e) 13.79 rad/s2

My Calculations:
20rev*2PIrad/rev = 40PI rad = theta
t = 8 sec
wo = 126 rad/sec

theta = wo*t+1/2*a*t^2
40PI = 126*8+.5*a*8^2
40PI-126*8 = 32a
a = -27.57 rad/sec^2
Let's back up:

A grindstone, originally rotating at 126 rad/s undergoes a constant angular acceleration so that it makes 20.0 rev in the first 8.00s. What is the angular acceleration?

We have u = 126rads^-1
We also have s = 20rev = 40Pi Radians
t = 8s
Now we're left with:
40Pi = (126)(8) + 1/2a(64)
40Pi = 1008 + 32a
a = -27.57300918...rad s^-2

Same answer here...
Perhaps mistake in the question? (Maybe..)
 
I have -27.57 too. At any rate, none of the proposed answer have a minus sign, so they're all wrong :wink:.

But it's quite probable that there's a mistake in the answer... because 13.79 rad/s2 is exactly half of our answer. As if the dude making the question had forgotten the 1/2 in

\theta (t) = \theta_0 + \omega_0 t + \frac{1}{2}\alpha t^2

which is a common mistake when one plugs all the numerical values and solve for the answer...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top