Angular Acceleration of a grinding wheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration and maximum angular velocity of a vertical grinding wheel with a specific mass and radius. For part (a), the initial angular acceleration is calculated to be approximately 9.31 rad/s², with some participants suggesting slight variations in the moment of inertia value used. In part (b), the maximum angular velocity is found to be 3.32 rad/s, but there's a correction needed regarding the height from which the weight drops, which is 0.69 m instead of the wheel's radius. Participants are encouraged to review their calculations, particularly regarding the torque and height in the context of the problem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of accurately applying physics equations to solve for angular motion.
spirited
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A vertical grinding wheel is a uniform disk of mass 62 kg and radius 45 cm. It has a handle of radius 69 cm of negligible mass. A 25-kg load is attached to the handle when it is in the horizontal position.
(a) Neglecting friction, find the initial angular acceleration of the wheel in rad/s^2.
(b) Find the maximum angular velocity of the wheel in rad/s.

Homework Equations


I = 1/2MR^2 + mr^2
t = mgr for torque
a = t/I for angular acceleration
mgr = 1/2Iw^2

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Neglecting friction, find the initial angular acceleration of the wheel.
9.31 rad/s^2
I found I which is 18.18 kg m^2 using the above equation.
I then gound T(t) which is 169.23 Nm
a = t/I = 9.31 rad/s^2

(b) Find the maximum angular velocity of the wheel.
I used mgr = 0.5Iw^2 and got w = 3.32 rad/s

***What am I doing wrong?? I know both are wrong answers. I think I am doing something wrong for part a. Please help!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

I think for a) your method is OK. I calculate 9.2 m/s2
with I = 18.38 but let's not quibble too much over that.

For b) though I think you are overlooking that the 25 kg weight has dropped .69 m and not the r of .45.
 
I understand it now...Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top