Angular acceleration problem Help

AI Thread Summary
A space station designed in a wheel shape with a diameter of 23 m and a mass concentrated at the rim is set to rotate to simulate Earth's gravity through radial acceleration. The thrust from two rockets, each providing 150 N, is used to achieve the required spin rate. The calculations for angular acceleration and desired spin rate involve using formulas related to torque and moment of inertia. A critical error identified in the calculations was mistaking the diameter for the radius, which led to incorrect results. Correcting this mistake is essential for accurately determining the time needed to reach the desired spin rate.
akan
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
A space station is constructed in the shape of a wheel 23 m in diameter, with essentially all of its 7.9×10^5 kg mass at the rim. Once the station is completed, it is set rotating at a rate that requires an object at the rim to have radial acceleration g, thereby simulating Earth's surface gravity. This is accomplished using two small rockets, each with 150 N thrust, that are mounted on the rim of the station.

How long will it take to reach the desired spin rate?

Formulas:
T = rFsinTHETA
T = I {alpha}
I = MR^2

Finding anuglar acceleration:
2RF = MR^2 {alpha}
2F = MR {alpha}
2F/MR = {alpha}

Finding the desired spin rate:
a = v^2/r
= w^2r^2 / r
= w^2r
w = sqrt(a/r)
= sqrt(g/r)

Finding the time:
t = w/ {alpha}
= sqrt(g/r) * MR / 2F
= sqrt(9.81 / 23) * (7.9*10^5) * (23) / (2 * 150)
= 3.96 * 10^4

Mastering Physics says I am wrong. Where is the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

I don't believe that this is such a difficult problem that no one can help me with a proper solution... This is just basic Physics B. So please help me.

Thanks,
Anthony
 
23 m is the diameter, not the radius.
 
Wow, that's it? Wow... damn it. I read the problem many times over and never saw this stupid mistake. Thanks a lot. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top