Angular Acceleration Problem Why am I not right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of blender blades that slow from 7900 rpm to rest in 4 seconds. The initial conversion of rpm to rad/sec was initially incorrect, leading to confusion about the resulting angular acceleration. After correcting the conversion to 827.2860654 rad/sec, the calculated angular acceleration was found to be -206.8215164 rad/sec². Participants noted that the sign of the acceleration could be ambiguous without a specified direction, suggesting that reporting only the magnitude might be appropriate. The final consensus is that the method used for calculation is correct, and the units are appropriately handled.
tjohn101
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The blades in a blender rotate at a rate of 7900 rpm. When the motor is turned off during operation, the blades slow to rest in 4.0 s. What is the angular acceleration as the blades slow down?

Vi= 7900 rpm = 82.72860654 rad/sec (This may be my error)
Vf= 0
t= 4 secs

Homework Equations


<br /> v = v_0 + a t<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving for a in the answer above but the answer is incorrect.. I did:

0 = 82.72860654 + a(4)
and when solved got an answer of -20.68215164. I'm unsure of why this is NOT correct. Any help is greatly appreciated.

I think the problem may be in my conversions to rad/sec or maybe I am forgetting to convert something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tjohn101 said:
Vi= 7900 rpm = 82.72860654 rad/sec (This may be my error)
You're off by a factor of ten.
 
Doc Al said:
You're off by a factor of ten.

Please tell me if this is the right method:

(7900*2pi)/60

If I do this then I get 827.2860654. Does that sound correct?
 
tjohn101 said:
Please tell me if this is the right method:

(7900*2pi)/60

If I do this then I get 827.2860654. Does that sound correct?
Perfect!
 
Doc Al said:
Perfect!

Okay, and when I solve using the equation above I get the acceleration as being -206.8215164. It is already in rad/sec^2, correct? No conversions needed there?
 
tjohn101 said:
Okay, and when I solve using the equation above I get the acceleration as being -206.8215164. It is already in rad/sec^2, correct? No conversions needed there?
Correct. You are computing Δω/Δt, so the units take care of themselves (since you already converted everything to standard units): (rad/s)/(s) = rad/s^2.
 
Doc Al said:
Correct. You are computing Δω/Δt, so the units take care of themselves (since you already converted everything to standard units): (rad/s)/(s) = rad/s^2.

Now there is one small problem. The answer is wrong. Would it be positive?
 
tjohn101 said:
Now there is one small problem. The answer is wrong. Would it be positive?
The question is ambiguous as to sign, since no direction or sign convention was given. I would just give the magnitude of the acceleration.
 
Back
Top