I Angular Momenta and Actions of Orbits

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter tade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between a planet's angular momentum and the action of its orbit around a massive star. It is established that if angular momentum is fixed, the eccentricity of the orbit influences the action integral, which is defined as the integral of momentum with respect to displacement over one complete orbit. Different eccentricities lead to different orbital paths, each corresponding to a stationary value of action. The action principle can be applied to determine these trajectories, indicating that various geodesics exist based on initial conditions. Ultimately, the eccentricity affects the action even when angular momentum remains constant.
tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
Consider a tiny planet orbiting a massive star.

If the value of the planet's angular momentum (w.r.t. to star) is fixed, does the action of the planet's orbit depend on the eccentricity of the orbit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tade said:
Consider a tiny planet orbiting a massive star.

If the value of the planet's angular momentum (w.r.t. to star) is fixed, does the action of the planet's orbit depend on the eccentricity of the orbit?
pl.explain the term action of ...
 
drvrm said:
pl.explain the term action of ...
the integral of momentum w.r.t. displacement for one loop of the orbit
 
tade said:
If the value of the planet's angular momentum (w.r.t. to star) is fixed, does the action of the planet's orbit depend on the eccentricity of the orbit?

the value of angular momentum defines the trajectory of the body as per Keplar's laws and thus has a defined eccentricity -so the action integral will have a stationary value for actual/ particular path . For different eccentricities the paths will be different and the action should have another stationary value,
for example;

The path in space of a body in a gravitational field can be found using the action principle. for a free falling body, this trajectory is a geodesic.
but different geodesics can exist for different initial conditions.
similarly if a body is projected in space with certain energy and falls in the field of another body it can move on a variety of paths but the actual path will have a stationary action.
 
Let's keep it to classical inverse square law.

Because we can have different eccentricities for the same value of angular momentum.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top