Angular momentum addition and expansion in states

Onamor
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part (e) of the attached question. Sorry for using a picture, and thanks to anyone who can help.

Homework Equations


the answer to part (d) is that the eigenvalue is
\hbar^{2}\left(l\left(l+1\right) + s\left(s+1\right)+2m_{l}m_{s}\right)
where, for this part of the question, m_{l}=l and m_{s}=s.

The Attempt at a Solution


I try to expand the state \left|1/2,1/2\right\rangle in \left|l m_{l}, s m_{s}\right\rangle but would I need six components (and therefore six coefficients)?
Because we have l=1 then m_{l}=1,0,-1 and for each of those we can have m_{s}=1/2,-1/2.
I can act with J^{2} on this expansion and use the formula for the eigenvalues above, but then I still have 6 unknown coefficients.

If I expand the state as \left|j,m_{j}\right\rangle then there are four components for m_{j}=3/2,1/2,-1/2,-3/2.
Acting with J_{+} on rids me of the first term but I still have 3 unknowns.

The last equation I haven't used yet is the normalisation of the coefficients but so far I have too many unknowns for it to be useful.

Thanks very much to any helpers, really not sure where to go with this one..
 

Attachments

  • q9.jpg
    q9.jpg
    72.2 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (d), you should be able to show that the expression you have is equal to \hbar^2j(j+1) where j=l+s.

For part (e), considering just the z-component, you have Jz=Lz+Sz. Use this fact to cut down on the number of |l ml; s ms> states you have to consider.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top