Angular momentum and Expectation values (Another question)

Ben4000
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the fact that ,\left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle show that \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle = 1/2 \hbar^{2}(l(l+1)-m^{2}.

The Attempt at a Solution



L^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar^{2}l(l+1) \left|l,m\right\rangle

L_{z} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar m \left|l,m\right\rangle

\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \hbar^{2}l(l+1)

\left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2}\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle

\left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle = 1/2 (\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle - \left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle )
I don't think that this is really showing the solution since i have just stated that

\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle

and

\left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2}. Unless it is genrally true that \left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L} \right\rangle^{2
What do you think?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ben4000 said:

Homework Statement



Using the fact that ,\left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle show that \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle = 1/2 \hbar^{2}(l(l+1)-m^{2}.

In order to calculate any expectation value, you need to know the state of the system. I assume that you are trying to calculate \langle \hat{L}_x^2\rangle in the state |l,m\rangle?


I don't think that this is really showing the solution since i have just stated that

\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle


Well, certainly \langle\hat{L}^2\rangle=\langle\hat{L}_x^2+\hat{L}_y^2+L_z^2\rangle...What is the definition of expectation value?...Do the inner products involved satisfy properties that will allow you to conclude that \langle\hat{L}_x^2+\hat{L}_y^2+L_z^2\rangle=\langle\hat{L}_x^2\rangle+\langle\hat{L}_y^2\rangle+\langle\hat{L}_z^2\rangle?

and

\left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2}. Unless it is genrally true that \left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L} \right\rangle^{2



What do you think?

Again, appeal to the definition of expectation value...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
In order to calculate any expectation value, you need to know the state of the system. I assume that you are trying to calculate \langle \hat{L}_x^2\rangle in the state |l,m\rangle?

Yes

gabbagabbahey said:
Well, certainly \langle\hat{L}^2\rangle=\langle\hat{L}_x^2+\hat{L}_y^2+L_z^2\rangle...What is the definition of expectation value?...Do the inner products involved satisfy properties that will allow you to conclude that \langle\hat{L}_x^2+\hat{L}_y^2+L_z^2\rangle=\langle\hat{L}_x^2\rangle+\langle\hat{L}_y^2\rangle+\langle\hat{L}_z^2\rangle?
\left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle l,m\right|<br /> L^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

\left\langle l,m\right|<br /> L^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \left\langle l,m\right|<br /> L_{x}^{2}+L_{y}^{2}+L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />\left\langle l,m\right|<br /> L^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \left\langle l,m\right|<br /> L_{x}^{2}\left|l,m\right\rangle + \left\langle l,m\right|L_{y}^{2}\left|l,m\right\rangle +\left\langle l,m\right| L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

<br /> \left\langle \hat{L}^{2} \right\rangle = \left\langle \hat{L}_{x}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{y}^{2} \right\rangle + \left\langle \hat{L}_{z}^{2} \right\rangle<br />

yes?

gabbagabbahey said:
Again, appeal to the definition of expectation value...

Still not so sure about this one...

<br /> \left\langle l,m\right| L_{z} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar m<br />

<br /> L_{z} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar m \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

<br /> L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

<br /> \left\langle l,m\right| L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2}<br />
 
Ben4000 said:
Still not so sure about this one...

<br /> L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

<br /> \left\langle l,m\right| L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle = (\hbar m)^{2}<br />

Why aren't you sure about this?

\langle L_{z}^{2} \rangle=\left\langle l,m\right| L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle=\langle l,m| (\hbar m)^{2} |l,m\rangle=\hbar^2m^2\langle l,m |l,m\rangle
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Why aren't you sure about this?

\langle L_{z}^{2} \rangle=\left\langle l,m\right| L_{z}^{2} \left|l,m\right\rangle=\langle l,m| (\hbar m)^{2} |l,m\rangle=\hbar^2m^2\langle l,m |l,m\rangle
I am not sure how you can infer that <br /> \hat{L}_{z}^{2} = (\hbar m)^{2}<br /> from <br /> L_{z} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar m \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />
 
Last edited:
Ben4000 said:
I am not sure how you can infer that <br /> \hat{L}_{z}^{2} = (\hbar m)^{2}<br /> from <br /> L_{z} \left|l,m\right\rangle = \hbar m \left|l,m\right\rangle<br />

You can't!

However, you can infer that

L_z^2|l,m\rangle=L_zL_z|l,m\rangle=L_z(\hbar m|l,m\rangle)=\hbar m L_z|l,m\rangle=\hbar^2 m^2|l,m\rangle[/itex] <br /> <br /> and that&#039;s all that&#039;s needed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top