Angular Momentum and Expectation Values

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the expectation values of the angular momentum operators L^2 and L_3, particularly in the context of angular dependence and its implications in quantum mechanics. Participants explore theoretical aspects, historical perspectives, and mathematical reasoning related to angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the expectation values of L^2 and L_3 are equal only when there is no angular dependence, suggesting a possible connection to the restriction of angular momentum to the z-axis.
  • Another participant proposes that angular momentum without angular dependence equates to momentum, implying both expectation values would be zero.
  • A participant explains that is the sum of , , and , and notes that is non-zero, which may contribute to the differences in expectation values.
  • Historical context is provided regarding early quantum mechanics models that attempted to explain angular momentum, including references to the vector model of the atom and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • One participant speculates that to have all angular momentum in the z direction, a particle must have a precise position on the z-axis, while it remains free in the X-Y plane, suggesting a logical scenario based on the commutation relations of momentum operators.
  • A separate question is raised about demonstrating a specific inequality involving angular momentum for a given quantum number, indicating a mathematical inquiry related to expectation values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of angular dependence and the relationship between the expectation values of L^2 and L_3. There is no consensus on the interpretations or implications of these relationships, and multiple competing perspectives are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about angular momentum and its representation in quantum mechanics, as well as the implications of non-commuting operators. The mathematical steps and definitions related to the inequalities mentioned remain unresolved.

hc91
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me why the only time that the expectation of L^2 operator and the expectation value of L_3^2 are equal only when there is no angular dependence? And what does this mean? Does this have something to do with being restricted to the z-axis which is what L_3 is associated with? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum without angular dependence is just momentum right? So both are equal ... to zero. Just a quick perspective on my part, sorry if that is the wrong answer.
 
Because <L2> = <Lx2> + <Ly2> + <Lz2>, and <Lx2 + Ly2> is non zero.

Back in the early days of quantum mechanics, when people were stuck on the idea that subatomic particles should be thought of as little balls running around in definite orbits, they tried to come up with various mechanistic models to "explain" this fact. In the vector model of the atom, L is a vector of length √l(l+1) inclined at whatever angle is necessary to make its projection on the z-axis come out m, and L then precesses around the z-axis like a wobbling top.

Or since Lx, Ly and Lz do not commute, maybe it had something to do with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Or, when group theory came into prominence, it was because L2 was the Casimir operator of the three-dimensional rotation group.

Actually it's just because <L2> = <Lx2> + <Ly2> + <Lz2>, and <Lx2 + Ly2> is non zero! :smile:
 
Bill_K said:
Or since Lx, Ly and Lz do not commute, maybe it had something to do with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Or, when group theory came into prominence, it was because L2 was the Casimir operator of the three-dimensional rotation group.
:

I just had a thought. In order to have 100% of your angular momentum in the z direction the particle must have an exact position on the z axis. However it is free to be wherever on the X-Y plane and all the particle's momentum is also on the X-Y plane. Since P_x and P_y both commute with z this scenario seems logical.
 
I have a question of my own, regarding angular momentum. Suppose that L=3 (that is the quantum number). How can I show that <L[itex]_{x}[/itex]>+<L[itex]_{y}[/itex]>+<L[itex]_{z}[/itex]> [itex]\leq[/itex] 3[itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex]h(bar) ?The mean value is taken with an arbitrary [itex]\psi[/itex], not necessarily with an eigenstate of L[itex]_{z}[/itex],L[itex]^{2}[/itex], i.e. |l,m>...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K