Angular Momentum and Principal Axes of Inertia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for angular momentum \(\vec L\) of a rigid body rotating about an arbitrary axis, expressed as \(\vec L = \vec u_{x} I_1 \omega_{x0} + \vec u_{y} I_2 \omega_{y0} + \vec u_{z} I_3 \omega_{z0}\). This formula is established based on the linear relationship between angular momentum and angular velocity, where the inertia is represented as a tensor quantity. The conversation highlights the distinction between rotation about principal axes and arbitrary axes, emphasizing that the inertia tensor is diagonal in the principal axes coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its vector representation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of inertia tensor in physics.
  • Knowledge of rigid body dynamics and rotational motion.
  • Basic understanding of linear algebra, particularly tensors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inertia tensor for various geometries.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of tensors in physics.
  • Explore the relationship between angular momentum and angular velocity in detail.
  • Investigate the implications of principal axes of inertia in rigid body dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the principles of angular momentum and inertia in rigid body motion.

jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi

I´m self-studying Alonso and Finn´s Mechanics and I have a question about this subject.

Let a body rotate about an arbitrary axis P having angular momentum \vec L.
Consider a referential with three perpendicular axes, X_{0} , Y_{0} , Z_{0} , which are also principal axes of inertia.
The book says we can write \vec L as

\vec L = \vec u_{x} I_1 \omega_{x0} + \vec u_{y} I_2 \omega_{y0} + \vec u_{z} I_3 \omega_{z0}

Does anybody how to derive this formula? The book usually explains things, but perhaps this is supost to be obvious.

By the way, I already know how to derive \vec L = I \vec \omega for a body rotating about a principal axis of inertia but I don´t know how to derive this one.

Thank you​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, if a rigid body is rotating about an arbitrary axis, the angular momentum need not point in the same direction as the rotation axis, as it does when \vec L = I \vec \omega (for rotation about a principal axis).

The relation between \vec L and \omega is still linear, and I is generally a tensor quantity (the inertia tensor).
An object always has three principal axes and in that coordinate system the inertia tensor is diagonal. This leads directly to:
<br /> \vec L = \vec u_{x} I_1 \omega_{x0} + \vec u_{y} I_2 \omega_{y0} + \vec u_{z} I_3 \omega_{z0} <br />
It's really the only thing it can be if you know \vec L = I \vec \omega holds for principal axes, there are three principal axes and the correspondence between \vec w and \L is linear.
 
Hello Galileo,

Thanks for the answer. Unfortunately, I couldn´t follow it because I don´t know what a tensor is. I´m still a high school student. I guess I´ll just have to use it without knowing how to derive it. which is something I really hate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K