Angular momentum in planetary/satellite orbital systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between a planet's rotation and the orbit of a large satellite, specifically addressing whether the planet's rotation would vary with the satellite's distance. It is noted that while the moon's orbit speeds up as it gets closer to the planet due to the conservation of angular momentum, the moon's rotation remains constant relative to itself. The Earth's rotation is affected by tidal forces from the moon, causing it to slow down over time, which in turn leads to the moon receding from the Earth. The conversation also explores whether pushing the moon closer would shorten the Earth's day, concluding that such a scenario would not have a significant impact. Overall, the interaction between the bodies is complex, with tidal forces playing a crucial role in their rotational dynamics.
Slorrin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a planet had a large massive satellite, on a long elliptical orbit, would the planet's rotation slow and speed up depending on the distance of the moon from the planet?

I'm thinking of how a skater, the classical example of angular momentum, speeds up when bringing in her arms, and slows down when extending them. Would that happen to a rotating planet? different rates of rotations? even small ones?

thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cool question. I don't think the moon's rotation would change in the way you're thinking.

To conserve the angular momentum of the moon around the planet, its speeds up when its closer to the planet (Kepler's law... etc). The ROTATION of the moon has no angular momentum with regard to the planet; it only has angular momentum relative to itself, and therefore needs to remain constant.

On a different level however, tidal forces will act on the moon's rotation... I'm not sure how the details of that work however.
 
lzkelley said:
Cool question. I don't think the moon's rotation would change in the way you're thinking.

To conserve the angular momentum of the moon around the planet, its speeds up when its closer to the planet (Kepler's law... etc). The ROTATION of the moon has no angular momentum with regard to the planet; it only has angular momentum relative to itself, and therefore needs to remain constant.

On a different level however, tidal forces will act on the moon's rotation... I'm not sure how the details of that work however.

well, I'm not interested in the moons rotation, though i guess that's moot since in te system, both bodes are essentially moons of one another.

The Earth's rotation slows due to the moon's tidal force, and as a result the moon moves further away, conserving angular momentum. So the Earth's' rotation DOES affect the moon's distance. Slow the Earth's day down, and the moon recedes from the earth. So the rotation of the individual bodies in the system does affect and is affected by the orbits of the other body. The question is, in what way precisely.

And would the inverse be true. If you pushed the moon closer to the earth, would the Earth's' day shorten?

because the moon deffinately recedes as a result of the day lengthening. Which it does gradually over time. Except for events like the tsunami of 2004, where the Earth 's day decreased by a small amount.

I remember reading in some book by arthur C clarke in which the moon was destroyed, that hte immediate reaction was the Earth's rotation slowing down. Clarke was a rigorously scrupulus sci fi writer and was a scientist himself, and this just came to me now.

i just can't find a clear explanation anywhere.
 
Slorrin said:
If a planet had a large massive satellite, on a long elliptical orbit, would the planet's rotation slow and speed up depending on the distance of the moon from the planet?
That doesn't happen, at least not in the sense you are thinking. But see the discussion at the end.

I'm thinking of how a skater, the classical example of angular momentum, speeds up when bringing in her arms, and slows down when extending them.
That's not a particularly good analogy. The skater's arms are attached to the skater. They rotate at the same rate as does the skater as a whole. A moon's orbit period and a planet's rotation period can be quite different. The Moon, for example, orbits the Earth every 27.3 days.

Slorrin said:
The Earth's rotation slows due to the moon's tidal force, and as a result the moon moves further away, conserving angular momentum. So the Earth's' rotation DOES affect the moon's distance. Slow the Earth's day down, and the moon recedes from the earth. So the rotation of the individual bodies in the system does affect and is affected by the orbits of the other body. The question is, in what way precisely.
This is a very, very slow process. One solar day was 21.9 hours long 620 million years ago. The mechanism by which this happens is called tidal locking; here's the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking" on the subject.

And would the inverse be true. If you pushed the moon closer to the earth, would the Earth's' day shorten?
No, at least not if you attach some big honking rockets to the Moon and use those rockets to bring the Moon closer to the Earth.

The Moon and Sun do have a short-term effect on the Earth's instantaneous rotation rate. Here is a plot of excess length of day (length of one solar day less 86,400 seconds):

http://www.iers.org/images/figc.png
Source: http://www.iers.org/MainDisp.csl?pid=95-97[/size]

The bottom two subplots show that zonal tides do affect the Earth's rotation rate. The Moon and Sun raise tides in not just the oceans but in the Earth as a whole (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide" on Earth tides).

Here your ice skater analogy is a very apt. The ice skater, by pulling her arms in / pushing her arms out, is changing her moment of inertia. These Earth tides (plus the ocean tides, to a lesser extent) caused by the Moon and Sun act to change the Earth's inertia tensor. The Earth's inertia tensor oscillates because of the tides, but oscillates with 288 or so different frequencies (tidal theory is a convoluted mess.) The largest oscillations are the semidurnal and diurnal tides. The Lunar fortnightly and monthly oscillations represent less than a tenth of the total, but it is not zero. The shape of the Moon's orbit does have an affect on the Earth's rotation rate, albeit a very small one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So then, if the shape of the moon's orbit DOES have an effect on the rotatoin rate, albeit a very small one, what would have to change for that effect to be a great one? THe mass of the moon to increase a zillion fold? The eccentricty of the orbit to change radically so that the effect would be more pronounced?

just curious
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top