Angular Momentum, Inertia and Kinetic Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rotating wooden turntable and a sandbag dropped onto it. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding angular momentum and the conservation laws applicable to the scenario. The initial moment of inertia is calculated, but there is confusion regarding the relationship between angular velocity and inertia post-collision. Key concepts include the distinction between initial and final states of the system and the fact that kinetic energies before and after the sandbag is dropped are not equal due to the inelastic nature of the collision. The conversation encourages the original poster to clarify their approach and demonstrate their efforts to solve the problem.
AndreewL
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



  1. A large wooden turntable in the shape of a flat disk has a radius of 1.50 m and a total mass of 100 kg. The turntable is initially rotating about its vertical axis through its centre with an angular velocity of 2.50 rad/s. From a very small height a 100 kg sand bag is dropped vertically onto the turntable at a point near the outer edge.

    a) Find the angular velocity of the turntable after the sand bag is dropped (assume that the bag can be treated as a point ).

    b) Calculate the kinetic energy of the system before and after the bag is dropped. Why are the kinetic energies not equal?


Homework Equations


I=1/2MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been stuck on this for a couple days now just playing around with it and haven't seem to get anywhere towards the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AndreewL, Welcome to Physics Forums.

You'll have to show some effort, showing what you've attempted during your "playing around with it". What avenues have you explored? What equations have you investigated?

Hint: This is effectively a collision type of problem involving angular motion rather than linear motion. What type of collision it? What is conserved in such collisions?
 
Clearly, there is a "initial" and "final" situation.
Can you try to identify what quantities are important in this problem?
What are those quantities (in terms of what is given) for the "initial" and "final" situations?
If there are unknowns, what laws of physics would be useful to relate the unknowns to the givens?
 
robphy said:
Clearly, there is a "initial" and "final" situation.
Can you try to identify what quantities are important in this problem?
What are those quantities (in terms of what is given) for the "initial" and "final" situations?
If there are unknowns, what laws of physics would be useful to relate the unknowns to the givens?
Please wait for the OP to respond to the initial hint before providing additional help. Forum rules require that an attempt at a solution or at least a solid demonstration of effort be shown before help can be given.
 
robphy said:
Clearly, there is a "initial" and "final" situation.
Can you try to identify what quantities are important in this problem?
What are those quantities (in terms of what is given) for the "initial" and "final" situations?
If there are unknowns, what laws of physics would be useful to relate the unknowns to the givens?

I worked out the initial moment of inertia to be 112.5, I'm just unsure on equations lining angular velocity and Inertia
 
AndreewL said:
I worked out the initial moment of inertia to be 112.5, I'm just unsure on equations lining angular velocity and Inertia
What are the corresponding equations for linear motion? The equations for linear and angular motion take the same form, just the corresponding variables are renamed accordingly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top