Angular momentum of particle in xy plane

AI Thread Summary
A particle with a mass of 4 kg moves at 8 m/s in the positive x-direction along the line y=4 m. The angular momentum relative to the point (1 m, 10 m) was calculated using the formula L = m * r x v, resulting in -192 kg*m^2/s. The position vector was determined correctly, but there was a mistake in the order of the cross product, as it should be r x v instead of v x r. The discussion emphasizes the importance of vector direction in calculating angular momentum.
barz1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Okay so, particle of mass 4kg moves in positive x direction with v=8m/s along line y=4m. Find angular momentum relative to point (x,y) = (1m, 10m)


Homework Equations


Angular momentum L=mrxv

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, I set my velocity vector = (8i+0j)m/s and my position vector = (i -6j)m. I determined this position vector from the point (1,10) to the position of the velocity vector(0,4) and then just used the equation 4[(8i+0j)x(i-6j)] and came up with the answer -192 kg*m^2/s.

So my question I guess is did I determine my position and velocity vectors correctly and did is this how the angular momentum equation should be done?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi barz1! welcome to pf! :smile:
barz1 said:
Angular momentum L=mrxv

Basically, I set my velocity vector = (8i+0j)m/s and my position vector = (i -6j)m. I determined this position vector from the point (1,10) to the position of the velocity vector(0,4) and then just used the equation 4[(8i+0j)x(i-6j)] and came up with the answer -192 kg*m^2/s.

yes that's fine :smile:, except you used vxr instead of rxv :redface:

(personally, i'd have done an easy question like this much less formally … i'd say that the perpendicular from P to L is obviously -6j, so the angular momentum is 4 times -6j x 8i, = 192 i x j = 192 :wink:)
 
Hey thanks a lot tiny-tim ill remember your recommendation for test time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top