Angular Momentum: Physics Demonstration & Math Behind It

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics demonstration involving a spinning wheel, or gyroscope, that maintains its orientation due to high angular momentum. Participants explore the mathematical principles behind this phenomenon, particularly the relationship between angular momentum and torque. It is noted that the torque from gravity acts in a different direction than the angular momentum, leading to precession rather than the expected downward flop. The conversation also touches on the complexity of calculating the net torque on the wheel and the changes in velocity of point masses on the gyroscope. Overall, the thread emphasizes the intriguing dynamics of angular momentum and its implications in physics.
Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
We had a demonstration in physics, which I'm sure most of you have seen, of a wheel spinning very quickly maintaing it's orientation. (There is a string hooked to one end of the axle, and you expect the wheel to 'flop' downwards)

Now, I was just wondering what the math behind this is?

The spinning wheel has a high angular momentum in direction X while there is a torque from gravity in direction Y: after that...? This is definitely similar to it being difficult to slow an airplane rather than a ball.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alkatran said:
We had a demonstration in physics, which I'm sure most of you have seen, of a wheel spinning very quickly maintaing it's orientation. (There is a string hooked to one end of the axle, and you expect the wheel to 'flop' downwards)

Now, I was just wondering what the math behind this is?

The spinning wheel has a high angular momentum in direction X while there is a torque from gravity in direction Y: after that...?

The spinning wheel is typically called a gyroscope, and the movement is referred to as precession.

I'm pretty sure that it's possible to work things out starting from linear momentum to see that there's a net torque on the wheel as a rigid object by, for example, looking at the necessary change in velocity of point masses along various places on the gyroscope to tilt the axle while the wheel remains spinning.
 
F=force
m=mass
0=theta
I want to say F=mdcos0 but I am not 100% sure, and in physics when we are not 100% sure we say were just guessing.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top