Angular Momentum: Testing Understanding With Sphere Rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of angular momentum in relation to a rotating sphere. When torque is applied to the sphere, it rotates around an axis through its diameter. Once the torque is stopped, the net torque becomes zero, leading to no change in the axis of rotation and a constant moment of inertia. According to the law of conservation of angular momentum, the sphere will continue to rotate at a constant angular velocity without any external torque. The understanding presented is confirmed as correct.
Alpharup
Messages
226
Reaction score
17
I just want to test my understanding of angular momentum here... I rotate a sphere in space such that the axis of rotation passes through it's diameter, by applying a torque. At one moment of time, I just stop applying the torque. Now, the net torque on the sphere is zero.There is no change in axis of rotation(Therefore the moment of inertia is constant) Thus, by the law conservation of angular momentum, the sphere rotates with a constant angular velocity.
Is my understanding right? Please explain me if Iam wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds completely correct to me. When there is no torque on the sphere, angular momentum is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is angular momentum perpendicular to fixed axis of rotation constant?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
966
I Effects of External Torques on the Angular Momentum of Asymmetric Bodies
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Moment of Inertia about an axis and Torque about a point
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Does the classical theory of angular momentum explain this video of a unicycle robot?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
What are angular momentum and torque?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Conceptual questions about Angular Momentum Conservation and torque
Replies
2
Views
2K
Ball hits a pivoting rod, what torque changes the angular momentum of the ball?
Replies
14
Views
2K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top