Angular Momentum: Understanding Forces & Equilibrium for Sliding Down Slides

AI Thread Summary
A child sliding down a slide at constant speed is in mechanical equilibrium because the net force acting on them is zero, meaning all forces are balanced. However, they are not in static equilibrium since they are in motion, which differentiates the two states. The primary forces involved are gravity, friction, and the normal force, which do indeed cancel each other out to maintain constant velocity. The discussion clarifies that while the child is not stationary, they can still be in equilibrium as long as the net force remains zero. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the principles of angular momentum and forces in motion.
jcais
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I read about angular momentum on wikipedia.com.

It states that a child sliding down a slide at constant speed would be in mechanical equilibrium but not in static equilbrium. Why? Is it because the child is not stationary? What kinds of forces are involved besides gravity and friction? Do they not cancel each other?

May seem like a dumb quesiton, but I just need a little push.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton stated that a body would remain at rest or continue at a uniform velocity unless acted upon by an unbalance external force. Does that help?

(It may be paraphrased but the basics are there)
 
jcais said:
I read about angular momentum on wikipedia.com.

It states that a child sliding down a slide at constant speed would be in mechanical equilibrium but not in static equilbrium. Why? Is it because the child is not stationary? What kinds of forces are involved besides gravity and friction? Do they not cancel each other?

May seem like a dumb quesiton, but I just need a little push.

Thanks!
A body is in equilibirum if the net force is zero \sum {\vec F} = 0. This means that the acceleration is zero. Such a body is in mechanical equilibrium. But if the acceleration is zero, it can either be that the object moves at constant velocity or that it is at rest (with respect to some frame). If it moves at constant velocity it is in mechanical equilibrium (which had to do with forces) but not in static equilibirum (because it is in motion).

I am assuming that the slide is straight (no curvature). Otherwise in the curved part, the net force would not be zero.

The forces are: gravity, friction and the normal force.

Pat
 
It makes sense now. Thank you everyone. Have a great weekend! :-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top