Angular speed of a swinging rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular speed of a nonuniform rod as it swings from a horizontal to a vertical position. The rod has a mass of 2.0 kg, a length of 2.0 m, and a moment of inertia of 4.0 kg.m². The key to solving the problem lies in using conservation of energy, specifically focusing on the change in gravitational potential energy as the center of mass moves. The change in height of the center of mass must be accurately determined to find the angular speed. Ultimately, visualizing the rod's position and calculating the height difference is crucial for arriving at the correct solution.
chouZ
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonuniform 2-0 kg rod is 2.0 m long. The rod is mounted to rotate freely about a horizontal axis perpendicular to the rod that passes through one end of the rod. The moment of inertia of the rod about this axis is 4.0 kg.m2. The center of mass of the rod is 1.2 m from the axis. If the rod is released from rest in the horizontal position, what is its angular speed as it swings through the vertical position?


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to use conservation of energy but I am not really sure whether the height in the potential energy initially is the distance from the center of mass to the rotational axis or the length of the rod...?:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In calculating the change in gravitational PE of the rod, what matters is the change in height of its center of mass.
 
still a lit bit confused...the change in height..how can u calculate it? I mean I thought about it: the height h between the position of the center of mass initially and its position at the final moment...but i can find a way to find the answer...
 
Think it through. When the rod is horizontal, where is its center of mass? What about when it swings down to be vertical? Draw yourself a picture and figure out the change in height.
 
got it...thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top