Another Laws of Motion question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two bricks and a 0.1 kg block affecting their motion when removed. The user initially calculated the acceleration and velocities of the blocks incorrectly, leading to a misunderstanding of their subsequent movement. After the block is removed, both bricks move at a constant velocity of 4 m/s, resulting in a displacement of 4 meters for each block in the first second. The user realizes that there is no acceleration after the block's removal, as the weights balance each other out. The thread concludes with the user seeking further clarification on related motion problems.
konichiwa2x
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi this problem stumps me.

Two bricks each having a mass of 0.2 kg tied at the end of a light flexible cord and are passing over a small frinctionless pulley. A 0.1kg block is placed on one of the blocks and removed after 2 seconds. How far will each block move in the first second the 0.1kg block is removed?

My Work:

for one of the blocks: 0.3(10) - T = 0.3a
for the other block: T - 2 = 0.2a
solving, a = m/s^2
Then I found the velocities of each block after the 0.1kg block is removed. i,e v = 2(2) = 4m/s
actually, one of the blocks will have 4m/s and the other -4m/s.

for the block that has -4m/s velocity,
the displacement in the first second:
s = -4(1) - \frac{1}{2}(10)(1)
= -9m

and for the other block i got the displacement as 1m.

BOOK SOLUTION: my book says the correct answer is 4m for each block.

Please tell me where I went wrong. Thanks for your time!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
After the one kg block is removed, there is not acceleration of the two blocks. One 2 kg block balances the other, and both contribute to the tension in the cord.

One calculated the speed a 4 m/s for one block and -4 m/s for the other block, i.e. one moves up and the other down. In one second, what is the distance traveled at constant velocity?
 
allright thanks. got it now:smile:

by the way, can you please look at this thread I posted earlier today?
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=132919 It is related to the same topic. I have been practicing laws of motion problems all day and I really want to get it straight. only that question is left..thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top