Another Question About Angular Momentum in QM

Bobbo Snap
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the Hamiltonian H = (p^2/2m)+V commutes with all three components of L, provided that V depends only on r.

Homework Equations


In previous parts of the problem, I've worked out the following relations:
[L_z,x] = i\hbar y, \quad [L_z,y] = -i\hbar x, \quad [L_z, z] = 0,\\<br /> [L_z, p_x] = i\hbar p_y, \quad [L_z, p_y] = -i\hbar p_x, \quad [L_z, p_z] = 0,\\<br /> [L_z, L_x] = i \hbar L_y, \quad [L_z, r^2] = xy(xp_x - yp_y), \quad [L_z, p^2] = (xp_x -yp_y)p_xp_y

where
p_i = \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial i}, \quad r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2,\\<br /> p^2 = p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2, \quad L_z = yp_z - zp_y

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with [L_z, H], expanded it, canceled a bunch of stuff and wound up with,
[L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}(xp_yp_x^2 - yp_xp_y^2) + xp_yV - yp_xV + Vxp_y - Vyp_X.
Assuming I did everything right, I need this equation to equal 0 to show L_z commutes with H and the problem suggests that this can only be the case if V is a function of r, but I don't see how to get there. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so I can simplify that last equation to get
[L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}[L_z, p^2] + [L_z, V] =\frac{i\hbar}{2m}(p_y^2 -p_x^2) + [L_z, V]

How does this imply V must be a function of r?
(I guess I should have seen this from the form of the Hamiltonian).
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top