MHB Another Question on Torsion Elements .... D&F Section 10.1, Exercise 8 ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote's book: "Abstract Algebra" (Third Edition) ...

I am currently studying Chapter 10: Introduction to Module Theory ... ...

I need some help with an Exercise 8(c) of Section 10.1 ...

Exercise 8 of Section 10.1 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8313Can someone please demonstrate a rigorous solution to 8(c) ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

We know from the assumption that there are non-zero $a,b\in R$, such that $ab=0.$ Now let $M$ be a non-zero $R$-module. Note that we have

$M=\{m\in M: bm=0\}\cup \{m\in M: bm\neq 0\}.$

Since $M$ is a non-zero $R$-module, one of these two sets must contain a non-zero element. If the first contains said non-zero element, then $M$, by definition, has non-zero torsion elements since $b\neq 0.$ I will leave it to you to work on the case where $\{m\in M: bm=0\}=\{0\}.$
 
Last edited:
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...