Answer: Evaporative Cooling: Body Temp Drops 0.05°C w/ 10g Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling
AI Thread Summary
Evaporating 10g of water results in a body temperature drop of approximately 0.05°C for a 100kg person. The heat of vaporization for 10g of sweat is calculated to be about 22 kJ. This value is then used to determine the temperature change using the specific heat of water. The specific heat of water vapor and the heat of fusion are deemed irrelevant in this context, as the focus is solely on the cooling effect of water evaporation. The calculations confirm that these additional constants do not impact the outcome significantly.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



By how many degrees will your body cool if you evaporate away 10g of water? Specific heats of water and water vapor are, respectively, 4.18 J/gC and 2.00 J/gC. Heat of vaporization of water is 40.7 kJ/mol. Heat of fusion of water is 6.03kJ/mol. Assume a 100kg person who is mostly water.

Homework Equations



The heat of fusion and specific heat of water vapor are irrelevant. We don't have a person full of hot air in this hypothetical.

The Attempt at a Solution



First we calculate the heat of vaporization of 10g of sweat. The units are kJ/mol so we convert 10g to moles of water (10/18) and multiply by 40.7kJ to get the number of kJ, which is about 22 kJ.

Then we find how much the body is cooled. Convert kg of the body to grams since specific heat is given in terms of Joules per gram*Celsius. Convert kJ to Joules.

q = mcΔt = 100(1000) * 4.184 * Δt = 22,000 J

The change in temperature is about 0.05 degrees Celsius (I solved for delta T).

Question:

1) Am I correct in ignoring the specific heat of water vapor and the heat of fusion in the problem? We are, after all, talking about a body which is mostly water. Are these other constants just distractions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:
Am I correct in ignoring the specific heat of water vapor and the heat of fusion in the problem?

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top