Answer "Monosaccharides: Why 3 Carbon Atoms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lab one
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
AI Thread Summary
Monosaccharides, which are simple sugars, typically contain three to six carbon atoms, with trioses being the smallest. The discussion highlights that compounds with fewer than three carbons, such as glycolaldehyde, exhibit sugar-like properties but do not qualify as monosaccharides due to their empirical formula not aligning with the characteristics of sugars. A compound like HOCCHO, which features a hydroxyl group and an aldehyde, is mentioned as a potential 'diose,' but it is not recognized as a sugar. The conversation also clarifies that glyoxal, a dialdehyde, is distinct from hydroxyaldehydes. The need for a stable cyclic form is suggested as a criterion for classification as a monosaccharide.
lab one
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
challenge question!

whay does not monossacharides come less than three carbon atoms?? (I mean they just come triose to hexose)>>thnk you
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


the closest thing to a 'diose' wold be HOCCHO, or a hydroxyl group on one carbon and an aldehyde on the other.

it is very sugar-like, but isn't considered a sugar because the empirical ratio of elements can't be quite right when there are only 2 carbons.
 


Galap said:
the closest thing to a 'diose' wold be HOCCHO, or a hydroxyl group on one carbon and an aldehyde on the other.

it is very sugar-like, but isn't considered a sugar because the empirical ratio of elements can't be quite right when there are only 2 carbons.

Note that the compound you've written out is not an hydroxyaldehyde, rather a dialdehyde (glyoxal).

There is nothing wrong with Gylcolaldehyde OHCCH2OH [or (CH2O)2 in "carbo'hydrate'" terms] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glycolaldehyde&oldid=392458101), which suggests you may need a stable cyclic form to be a proper monosaccharide. Perhaps http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monosaccharide&oldid=391746084 can help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top