Answer: SHM: 45g Mass, .35m Amp - Speed Half Max Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vibrations Waves
AI Thread Summary
A 45 g mass with an amplitude of .35 m in simple harmonic motion will have a speed that is half its maximum velocity at approximately .3 m from equilibrium. The equation used to derive this result is v = v_max*sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2)], leading to the conclusion that the correct answer is A. The calculations confirm that .3 m is the only valid option under the given parameters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct formulas and understanding the relationship between position and velocity in harmonic motion. The final consensus is that .3 m is indeed the correct distance.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
How far from equilibrium will a 45 g mass with amp. of .35 m for a spring (k = 21 N/m) undergoing simple harmonic motion have a speed that is half its maximum velocity?
a. .3 m
b. .45 m
c. .7 m
d. .92 m
e. 3.5 m

Choice B is wrong.

Use

v = v_max*sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]

Do I use k or m at all?
(1/2)v_max = v_max*sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]
Left with:

1/2 =sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]

After plugging everything in and solving for x I get .303m (A.). Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay,let's take it this way.'A' is the only possible answer as it has the only figure less than the amplitude of oscillation.

Another rigurous mathematical justification would be:
x=A\sin\omega t(1)
v=\omega A\cos\omega t(2)
From (2) u get that for hamf of the maximum velocity the 'cos' must be 1/2,therefore the 'sin' would be \sqrt{3}/2.
Plug the sine into (1) and the "x" comes out to be 0.175\sqrt{3}m
,which can be (very roughly) approximated to 0.30m.

Daniel.
 


No, you are not wrong. The correct answer is indeed A. .3 m. The equation you used is correct, and by solving for x, you get the correct distance from equilibrium for the mass to have a speed that is half its maximum velocity. Good job!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top