ANSYS Basics Help: Is Meshing Necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashishvinayak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Basics
AI Thread Summary
Meshing is essential for all simulations using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), as it discretizes the geometry into smaller elements for accurate results. While 2D truss problems may not require traditional meshing, tutorials often recommend it for consistency and to align with FEA practices. Meshing can also be applied in 1D for beam elements, not just in 3D scenarios. The preprocessor in ANSYS can be complex, but alternative preprocessors like Ansa offer broader compatibility and user-friendly features. Understanding when to mesh is crucial for effective simulation outcomes.
ashishvinayak
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I've been studying ANSYS v11 from a book I bought online. I remember doing the same during my graduation. Now that I am studying in-depth I'd like to know why meshing is required (in more technical terms). Also, I am solving 2D truss related problems where I realize meshing is not done. However, when I checked online 2D truss tutorials suggest implementation of meshing. So what's the right answer? Is it necessary?

Ps. Additional question: I assumed that meshing is something which is attributed only to 3D members. Is this correct?

Please help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi!

about meshing, you can do 1D meshing (if you are working in beams) 2D or 3D

I'm not good at ansys, but I've found that preprocessor in Ansys is somehow messy and difficult to get used to. I use a magnificent preprocessor called Ansa (I use one of latest versions, 13.1. If you google around you can find it easy, and the good thing about it, is that has capabilities of beeing preprocessor for Ansys, Abaqus, Nastran, Pam crash, etc etc etc
 
I could use that but that wasn't my question really. I'd like to know when meshing should be used and when it should not be used ?
 
Meshing is required for all simulations using Finite Element Analysis. You will have to use meshing whenever you try and use programs that use FEA.

Some info on FEA http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/MSE2094_NoteBook/97ClassProj/num/widas/history.html
and the wikipedia article. (Check the references)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_element_method
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top