ANSYS RBE3 command vs Contact Wizard

  • Thread starter Thread starter CFDFEAGURU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Contact
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the preference between using the RBE3 command and the Contact Wizard in ANSYS for creating constraint equations. Users have noted that while the Contact Wizard can be problematic, the RBE3 command, although not ideal, offers advantages such as force distribution, which may enhance accuracy in certain applications. Concerns were raised about the inefficiency of using constraint equations with a large number of nodes, particularly in version 12.1, where a parameter array is required for slave nodes. Technical support was consulted regarding the parameter array requirement, highlighting a lack of clarity in the software. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the trade-offs between these two methods in ANSYS modeling.
CFDFEAGURU
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Hello all,

Just thought I would throw this one out there.

Who preferes to use the RBE3 command to automatically create a set of constraint equations and who prefers to use the Contact Wizard?

I used to use the Contact Wizard but I recently got burned by it, so I switched to using the RBE3 command, which isn't the most pleasant command either but hey it's ANSYS.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks
Mattt
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've personally never used RBE3s. I've either used MPC connections or CE/CPs. Do RBE3s have an advantage being nodal over MPCs (surface based)?
 
Do RBE3s have an advantage being nodal over MPCs (surface based)?

I am not sure is there is an actual advantage. I do know that using constraint equations with a large number of nodes can cause some inefficiency in the solution time.

In version 12.1 you have to use a parameter array for the slave nodes. A component will not work.

Thanks
Matt
 
I see that RBE3s are force-distributed rather than directly "coupled". This could things like applying moments probably more accurate. The thing about the parameter array is kinda dumb though. Why?
 
Why?

I am not sure. I had to call tech support because I didn't know you had to use a parameter array either. You can use components for every other command. I made a short text file that can be used for the job. It is a modification of the one that the tech support group sent me.

Let me know if you want it.

Thanks
Matt
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top