Ansys Workbench Static Structural Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simulating a static structure using ANSYS Workbench, focusing on issues related to result divergence when applying different forces, boundary conditions, and contact settings. Participants are exploring both the setup of the simulation and the potential for automating the process using APDL scripting.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports experiencing result divergence and suspects that loads and fixed supports may not be well defined.
  • Another participant requests clarification on boundary conditions and the specific problem being solved.
  • A participant describes their attempt to solve for equivalent stress and directional deformation, mentioning issues with frictional contact and receiving error messages related to diverged solutions.
  • Suggestions are made regarding the simplification of contact conditions, including the possibility of bonding components instead of using contact conditions, and recommendations for mesh density and refinement.
  • A new participant expresses interest in automating the finite element simulation using an APDL script, seeking confirmation on the feasibility of this approach.
  • Another participant confirms that APDL can replicate user interface functions but warns that scripting may be challenging for those unfamiliar with ANSYS.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and complexity of contact conditions, with some suggesting alternative approaches. The feasibility of automating simulations with APDL is also discussed, with varying levels of confidence in the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached consensus on the best methods for defining boundary conditions or contact settings, and there are unresolved questions regarding the specific version of ANSYS being used and its implications for the discussed issues.

Meliani
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Guys
I am New here on the foum
Well i am simulating a static structure (Picture attached) on ansys and til now i have a result divergence when i apply different forces.
i guess my loads and fixed supports aren't well defined.
Please Help i know it s a bit long but please give it some time.
image link: https://ibb.co/h3mAc6
the cylinders in the bottom are just made to simulate the behavior of the bolts and first i applied a fixed support on it.
For the load i made a face split on back face of the top part of the assembly (circle coccentric with the groove) since there will be a part to be supported on that face.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your image doesn't have enough context to tell us what the problem is. Can you summarize your boundary conditions and what you're trying to solve for?
 
Well
I am trying to solve the equivalent stress on the differents parts and the directional deformation
First when i define a frictional contact btw different part (threads and the contact in washers), i get an error message ( diverged solution and contact status has an abrupt change )
For boundary conditions, in the bottom of the image there is 4 cylinders , i fix all apparent surfaces, and apply a remote force on the back face of the L part located in the center of the elongated hole !
Once this settings defined i have a 700mpa stress, but i am using S235Jr steel and 8.8 steel for bolts nuts and washers !
Please help
Thank you a lot !
 
You don't mention what version of ANSYS you're using, but in any case you'll need to make sure you've got your settings right. Contact conditions are a pretty complicated topic, but in general here is some of the feedback I give every time. It's possible you don't need contact conditions at all; unless you expect to see a lot of movement at the bolts and washers I would seriously recommend you consider bonding them using a multi-body solid. Alternatively, consider deleting your washers altogether and then use a contact condition with just your bolts.

Contact condition guidelines:
  1. Pay close attention to your mesh density in the contact conditions. The mesh should be of similar size on both sides of the contact, you can use a "contact condition mesh refinement" to make sure this happens. I'd also recommend using hex-dominant mesh where possible, tetrahedrons tend to make for rougher stress gradients.
  2. Make sure you use an "Augmented Lagrange" formulation for the contacts between the components. This formulation tends to work best for me in most conditions.
  3. As a start, make the contact condition between the parts frictionless. Once you get it to converge, then you can think about considering friction.
  4. Make sure your contact condition forces update every substep, and split your problem into MANY substeps (on the order of 100).
Try this out and see what happens.
 
Hello everyone,

I want to automate the numerical simulation by finite element by using an APDL script starting with the definition of the material the mesh the named selection of the zones where I will apply the nodal force and the displacement and the post-processing, and all this in the static structure solver.

I would like to know if this is possible please.
 
APDL is just the scripting language for running ANSYS; in theory almost everything you can do in the user interface can be done through APDL. However if you're not familiar with ANSYS, this may a very challenging task.

Have you looked into using the conventional user interface? What problem are you trying to solve that requires scripting automation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K