Antenna Duplexer: Questions Answered on Low Impedance Transformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankJ777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the functioning and configuration of quarter wave cavity duplexers, particularly focusing on impedance transformation and the role of cable lengths in achieving desired filtering effects. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical applications, and specific configurations related to duplexers in communication systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the purpose of using 1/4 wavelength sections of cable in the duplexer setup, expressing confusion about impedance transformation when all components are stated to be 50 ohms.
  • Another participant notes that a 1/4 wave line acts as a transmission line transformer, suggesting that it can create different impedance appearances at either end depending on the termination.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential undesired impedance transformations that can occur with 1/4 wave interconnects, advocating for the use of 1/2 wavelength lengths to maintain consistent impedance.
  • One participant mentions that the interconnections are often described as 1/4 λ to enhance the rejection notch of the opposite frequency in band pass filters, but expresses confusion about the underlying electromagnetic theory.
  • There is a discussion about how the input impedance of a 1/4 λ transmission line can be calculated, with references to reactive impedances and the implications for power reflection.
  • Another participant elaborates on the structure of duplexers, explaining the role of cavities as bandpass filters and the necessity of filtering out unwanted frequencies to prevent overload.
  • Questions arise regarding whether the inputs to the cavities can be viewed as short circuits and how this relates to the transformation to an open circuit through the use of 1/4 λ cables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and implications of using 1/4 wavelength versus 1/2 wavelength cables in duplexer configurations. There is no consensus on the best approach or the clarity of the underlying electromagnetic principles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of the topic, noting that assumptions about impedance and the behavior of transmission lines may not be fully resolved. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and understandings of duplexer operation.

FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
Hi, I've got some questions about how the quarter wave cavity duplexer works in this configuration. From what I've read the cavities need to be connected together with 1/4 wavelength sections of cable. I'm not sure what the purpose of 1/2 cabling is. I'm told that its to transform the low impedance, but I'm not sure where. Also I thought the inputs to the receiver, transmitter and the cavities are all 50 ohms, so I'm not sure how the 1/4 wave cables would transform the impedance anyways.

thanks
2e16moz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am not sure that all of the cable lengths you have in your attachment are in fact 1/4 wave in the typical setup. It has been quite a while since I messed with a set of cans. Typically, a 1/4 wave line acts as a transmission line transformer. An open at one end of the 1/4 wave transmission line appears as a short circuit at the other end. And vice versa.
 
Yeah I understand about the transformation, but in this case I'm not sure where the impedance is that's supposed to be transformed. I thought that typically the receiver and transmitter ports are usually 50 ohms, and the input and outputs of the cans are 50 ohms.
 
For band pass or band reject filters, the cable lengths between cavities and between final cavities and the T- Connector to the single antenna feedline should ALL be electrical λ/2 long.

Using λ/4 lengths of interconnect cables can cause very undesired impedance transformations
This doesn't happen with λ/2 interconnects as the impedance seen at one end of a λ/2 will be seen at the other end

Also the cable lengths between the TX or RX and their respective first cavities is NOT critical. They can be any convenient length.

Cheers
Dave
 
Last edited:
I thought that typically the receiver and transmitter ports are usually 50 ohms, and the input and outputs of the cans are 50 ohms.

yes that is correct and that 's why in my last post I stated that its normal to use λ/2 lengths to avoid any impedance transformations if a cavity impedance changes due to detuning etc

Don't forget that a λ/4 impedance transformer will double the impedance presented to one end of itDave
 
Last edited:
Thanks Davenn.
I keep reading though, especially on papers at a ham site, that the interconnections between the cavities are 1/4 λ to deepen the rejection notch of the "opposite frequency" in the band pass filter. So I kind of understand what what they are saying it's purpose it but I don't understand how it is accomplished in an EM or transmission line theory way, which is something I would really like to understand. There explanation are that the 1/4 λ transform a low impedance to a high impedance thereby blocking the unwanted signal energy. I'm not exactly sure how that works. Do they mean converting a short to an open? From my understanding the impedance into a 1/4 λ transmission line is Zin = Z02/ZL, which normalized essentially means the input impedance is the reciprocal of the load impedance. And since, i think all impedance in the cavities are reactive, the transformer looks like it can only convert from a negative to a positive reluctance, or a short to and open, which from what I can tell both a zero and infinite impedance reflect 100% of the power at the input. Anyways, I'm confused about what's going on.

By the way, here are some links that reference the 1/4 λ interconnections, I just don't understand they're explanations, at least from an EM, transmission line perspective.
http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/quarter-wave-cables.html.
http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/pdf/ve2azx-duplexerinfo.pdf
http://www.seits.org/duplexer/duplexer.htm
http://www.repeater-builder.com/tx-rx/tx-rx-duplexer-instructions-manual-number-7-9176-4-(4-inch).pdf
 
A duplexer contains a number of cavities X 2. Common is 4 and 6 cavity setups. A 6 cavity setup will have 3 cavities for the receive and 3 for transmit. Obviously each cavity is a bandpass filter for the appropriate frequency. Amateur 2 meter repeaters have a 600 KHz split so a hypothetical case would be a 146.76/146.16 Mhz machine. The cavities connected to the transmitter pass 146.76 and the receiver's cavities pass 146.16. But each cavity is a little more than just a bandpass filter. Each cavity also contains a notch filter. The receiver's cavities notch the transmitter frequency for obvious reasons as to not overload the receiver. And the transmitter's cavities notch the receive frequency. Here is where transmission line length comes into play. Whenever you place a filter of this type in-line, the input to the filter appears as an open circuit at the frequency we wish to attenuate. After all, wouldn't one wish to do this? At the Tee connector where the transmission line heads to the antenna we want the receive frequency to not even see the transmitter cavities. We want it to look like an open circuit. This is where line length comes into play.
 
Averagesupernova said:
Here is where transmission line length comes into play. Whenever you place a filter of this type in-line, the input to the filter appears as an open circuit at the frequency we wish to attenuate.

OK, so I'm trying to understand how this set up works. Are the inputs to the cavities a short circuit, that the 1/4λ cable transforms to an open? Wouldn't an input that appears as a short circuit be just as effective for that matter since an open and short both have a reflection coefficient of unity?


Thanks. I've had the standard EM, transmission lines, and microwave engineering courses, but I"ve never encountered the analysis for a repeater duplexer and I'm trying to reconcile how they work with what I've learned before.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K