Antenna Resistance: Complex Implications in Real Life

AI Thread Summary
Antenna impedance is described as complex due to its real (resistive) and imaginary (reactive) components, which impact how antennas operate in oscillating current scenarios. The complex notation allows for a clear representation of phase shifts between voltage and current, essential for accurate circuit analysis. Using complex numbers simplifies calculations, particularly when applying Ohm's law in AC circuits, where phase differences are significant. While other mathematical representations exist, complex numbers provide a convenient framework for multiplication and analysis in electrical engineering. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective antenna design and operation.
Seanskahn
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello community

Sorry if this is a repost, but I don't find what i am looking for.

I am reading the book "anntenas", by Kraus and Marhefka

In page 30, says the antenna impedances are complex. Z{\tau} = +
R{\tau} + jX{\tau} ..

Could anyone please tell me what does the complex part imply in real life, and why is it regarded as complex.
Thank you

edit: the tau is supposed to be subscripted, but it is appearing as superscript :s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Impedance is used with complex notation for oscillation current. Suppose you have current oscillation at frequency ω and amplitude I0. Then the current is given by:

I = Re(I_0 e^{i \omega t}) = I_0 cos(\omega t)

The complex voltage is related to complex current using analog of Ohm's law.

V = Re(Z I_0 e^{i \omega t})

If Z is real, this is no different from Ohm's Law. But let's substitute your complex form in.

V = Re((R + iX) I_0 e^{i \omega t})

V = I_0 Re(R e^{i \omega t} + X e^{i (\omega t + \frac{\pi}{2})})

V = I_0 R cos(\omega t) - I_0 X sin(\omega t)

The first term is still just IR, but second term is phase-shifted by 90°. This expression can also be re-written using a single cosine function.

V = I_0 \sqrt{R^2 + X^2} cos(\omega t + \tan^{-1}(\frac{X}{R}))

In other words, the norm of Z gives you the ratio of peak voltage to peak current, and so plays a role of effective resistance, while the angle of Z in complex plane gives you the phase shift between voltage and current.
 
hi K2

Thanks you for the reply

then let me ask the next obvious question.
why don't we then just use any 2 dimensional plane for the Z vector?

etheta is still sin(theta) + cos(theta), albeit the sin and cos part is summed, and not distinguishable
 
Because then you can't write V = ZI. Multiplication is not defined in vector spaces, but is defined in complex space.

It's just a convenience, though. You can solve any circuit using ordinary voltage and current by breaking up each into sin and cos components. It just gets a little messy. Once you know a few tricks, working with impedances is very fast.
 
hi K2

thank you very much.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
35K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top