Anti vandal led button MOFSET question

  • Thread starter Thread starter BaDaBooMM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating an LED anti-vandal switch into an e-cigarette circuit, specifically addressing how to ensure the LED lights up only when the button is pressed. The original poster is confused about the necessary components, particularly the use of a MOSFET for controlling the LED and monitoring battery power. It is noted that the LED may require a higher voltage than the 3.7V provided by the e-cig battery, complicating the setup. A solution involving a double-pole, single-throw pushbutton and an N-channel MOSFET is suggested for proper operation. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of wiring and component selection in DIY electronics projects.
BaDaBooMM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm a total noob when it comes to electronics and you are going to lol at me. Please don't lol too hard.
Becuase I'm not really good at this stuff its going to be hard for me to explain but Ill do my best.

I have circuit board for an ecig that I want to use a led anti vandal switch for it like this one http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12mm-LED-Illuminated-Vandal-Proof-Anti-Vandal-Momentary-Push-Button-Switch-/331283052848?_trksid=p2054897.l4275

So what's the problem ? I only want the led to light up when the button is pressed and go off when the the button is released.

What I think I need is a MOFSET that can monitor the drain from the battery ??

As you can see my wiring diagrams if you can even call them that are for children. I've got this far and now I'm stuck.
Imhgjghage2.jpg


Any help would be much appreciated :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's a pretty confusing pushbutton + LED combination. From the e-Bay description, they say they used a 4.2V source and a 470k resistor to light the LED, which makes no sense at all. That's way too big of a resistor.

And going to the home website for the manufacturer, it looks like you need to specify what voltage you are going to put across the +/- terminals for the LED, which would imply that the current-limiting resistor is already part of the pushbutton housing:

http://www.onpow.com/en/product/product1351.html

The lowest LED voltage option they list is 6V, so you probably can't light the LED with just your 3.7V e-cigarette battery.

The simplest way to light an LED when you press a button to turn on your e-cigarette circuit would be to use a double-pole, single-throw pushbutton, and connect power to an LED through a current-limiting resistor with the second pole of the switch.
 
berkeman said:
That's a pretty confusing pushbutton + LED combination. From the e-Bay description, they say they used a 4.2V source and a 470k resistor to light the LED, which makes no sense at all. That's way too big of a resistor.

And going to the home website for the manufacturer, it looks like you need to specify what voltage you are going to put across the +/- terminals for the LED, which would imply that the current-limiting resistor is already part of the pushbutton housing:

http://www.onpow.com/en/product/product1351.html

The lowest LED voltage option they list is 6V, so you probably can't light the LED with just your 3.7V e-cigarette battery.

The simplest way to light an LED when you press a button to turn on your e-cigarette circuit would be to use a double-pole, single-throw pushbutton, and connect power to an LED through a current-limiting resistor with the second pole of the switch.

Thanks for help but I'm lost :)

This is what was posted in another forum but I don't really understand it.

You need an N fet like this one Infineon BSR802N L6327

It's not a complicated task to switch power to the battery monitor, just use a small power MOSFET in an SOT23 package which is not terribly small or hard to work with. The MOSFET gate is driven by the atomizer. The drain and source of the MOSFET switch the power supply to the monitor.

To work with the logic polarity of the atomizer (high = on, low = off) you need to use an N-channel MOSFET configured as a low side switch. The low side (battery negative) for the monitor is switched, not the high side (battery positive). The connection is as follows;

Ground for the detector connected to NMOS drain.
Battery negative connected to NMOS source.
A pull-down resistor connected from gate to source.
Atomizer positive connected to the gate.

That FET you selected should do the job just fine. You could even go as high as a 1/2 Ohm "on" resistance since the currents required to power the monitor are pretty low reducing the effect of switch resistance on voltage drops.

Pull down resistor values are not critical, anything between 4.7k and 47k should be fine. 10k would be a typical value.

I was following the instructions in the qouted text above and got stuck.

Imafghfgge3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top