Antiderivative Help: Calculate Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter OmniNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antiderivative
OmniNewton
Messages
105
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Calculate the following integral:
b1719ffb92379d42d595382b30430c6f.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


b1719ffb92379d42d595382b30430c6f.png

728c33c9e6b78570668463ea8929d8f2.png

36a8f99e810595ddc5eef07ea876eefe.png

from this point I tried a u-substitution by letting u = -3 + 4/x -1/x^2 but this seemed to fail.

Are any suggestions possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OmniNewton said:

Homework Statement


Calculate the following integral:
b1719ffb92379d42d595382b30430c6f.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


b1719ffb92379d42d595382b30430c6f.png

728c33c9e6b78570668463ea8929d8f2.png

36a8f99e810595ddc5eef07ea876eefe.png

from this point I tried a u-substitution by letting u = -3 + 4/x -1/x^2 but this seemed to fail.

Are any suggestions possible?
Try factoring the quadratic under the root sign first. You should be able to find two linear factors.
 
SteamKing said:
Try factoring the quadratic under the root sign first. You should be able to find two linear factors.
Alright thank you will attempt that now.
 
OmniNewton said:
Alright thank you will attempt that now.
Alright I have the indefinite integral factored for the argument however I am unsure how to proceed.
360ea395d27c22bc3e3818285928f822.png

I'm going to let u = x-1 which means x = u + 1 and for the second factor (3x-1) = (3x - 1 - 2 + 2) = [3(x-1) + 2]
 
OmniNewton said:
Alright I have the indefinite integral factored for the argument however I am unsure how to proceed.
360ea395d27c22bc3e3818285928f822.png

I'm going to let u = x-1 which means x = u + 1 and for the second factor (3x-1) = (3x - 1 - 2 + 2) = [3(x-1) + 2]

I may not be approaching this the right direction since after attempting this method I seem to be unable to proceed
 
There's usually several substitutions that work for these types of problems. The simplest one seems to be ##t=1/x##. At least that seem to work for me (but I did this rather quickly so I may have done something wrong).

Another approach that should work would be is to complete the square and then use the standard substitution ##\arcsin## but in this case it seems to be rather complicated and you would need another substitution ##s=\tan t/2## after as well.
 
That looks like I would complete the square of the term under the square root to get something to match arcsec or arccsc. 1/(u √ (u2-a2) is the one I believe i am thinking of..
 
Back
Top