Antiparticles: only distinct propery is C(Q)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neurocomp2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antiparticles
neurocomp2003
Messages
1,359
Reaction score
4
[Q0]Is the only distinct difference between a particle and antiparticle the charge?

Does it apply to
Quarks
Electron
Proton
Neutron(does it have a antiparticle?)
Neutrinos.
FCPs(do FCP have charge? well light doesn't but does a gluon...and what's the other one called not the graviton)
[Q1]
if neutrinos have no charge then how do they have antineutrinos?

[Q2] Is the EM spectrum discretized(intervals) or can you create a EM wave of any wavelength/frequency you choose?


[Q3]do mesons(q/^q) have fractional charges?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
neurocomp2003 said:
[Q0]Is the only distinct difference between a particle and antiparticle the charge?

Well,generally,yes,but there are quantum numbers (e.g.color & lepton) which differ from particle to antiparticle.

neurocomp2003 said:
if neutrinos have no charge then how do they have antineutrinos?

Yes,lepton number differs and helicity,too.Antineutrinos are right handed.They're theorized,but not observed.

neurocomp2003 said:
[Q2] Is the EM spectrum discretized(intervals) or can you create a EM wave of any wavelength/frequency you choose?

Any frequency.

neurocomp2003 said:
[Q3]do mesons(q/^q) have fractional charges?

No.The mesons have integer charge.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Antineutrinos are right handed.They're theorized,but not observed.

Antineutrinos can be produced in accelerator labs just as easily as neutrinos. To produce muon-antineutrinos, you start with a beam of \mu^{+} and let them decay; just as to produce muon neutrinos, you start with a beam of \mu^{-} and let them decay.
 
mesons have charge? i thought the sum of the two charges is 0?
 
Charged pions, charged rho's, charged kaons, charged D's, charged B's, etc.

Take one quark with a charge of 1/3 and another quark with charge of 2/3.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top