Anyone have any suggestions on books on chebyshev polynomials?

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i find that chebyshev polynomials are quite useful in numerical computations

is there any good references?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wdlang said:
i find that chebyshev polynomials are quite useful in numerical computations

is there any good references?

I agree - they are very useful. I have used the discrete orthogonality of them to build nice routines for special functions or integrals I run across (often factor out leading order asymptotic and/or oscillating portions). I usually use something like Mathematica or Maxima to calculate the coefficients to high precision, which I then use in a c or MATLAB routine.

Options I am familiar with include:

Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, by Boyd (may be free online version). This is pretty high level (for grad course I think) but has tons of stuff in it.

Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, by Hamming. I like this book, and it has a couple of nice chapters on this. Accessible to anyone who knows calculus.

Numerical Recipes, by Press et al., a nice general book that has good, practical sections on chebyshev polynomials. I am familiar with the 2nd edition, which is nice.

Prof. Trefethen has done some nice stuff recently, including leading the development of a nice package that can be used in recent versions of Matlab:
http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/publications/

good luck!

jason
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jasonRF said:
I agree - they are very useful. I have used the discrete orthogonality of them to build nice routines for special functions or integrals I run across (often factor out leading order asymptotic and/or oscillating portions). I usually use something like Mathematica or Maxima to calculate the coefficients to high precision, which I then use in a c or MATLAB routine.

Options I am familiar with include:

Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, by Boyd (may be free online version). This is pretty high level (for grad course I think) but has tons of stuff in it.

Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, by Hamming. I like this book, and it has a couple of nice chapters on this. Accessible to anyone who knows calculus.

Numerical Recipes, by Press et al., a nice general book that has good, practical sections on chebyshev polynomials. I am familiar with the 2nd edition, which is nice.

Prof. Trefethen has done some nice stuff recently, including leading the development of a nice package that can be used in recent versions of Matlab:
http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/publications/

good luck!

jason

thanks a lot

i am new to chebyshev polynomial actually

i have downloaded the book by boyd
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look at splines, ... then ...
 
you can refer to

Chebyshev polynomials by J. C. Mason
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top