Anyone here taken Real Analysis yet?

AI Thread Summary
Real Analysis is recognized as a challenging, proof-based course within math majors, often causing anxiety among students. Key strategies for success include finding a great instructor and dedicating significant time to the course. While some students express dislike for Real Analysis, others emphasize that a passion for math should naturally extend to its rigorous study. Recommendations for preparation suggest avoiding overly complex texts like Rudin initially; instead, starting with "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbott is advised for its clarity. Engaging with multiple sources and creating personal examples can help demystify concepts. Ultimately, a commitment to hard work and a focus on the broader concepts rather than getting bogged down by difficult definitions are crucial for thriving in Real Analysis.
luke8ball
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Real Analysis will be the most rigorous, proof-based course I've taken for my math major, and I'm concerned because a lot of people at my school HATE the course.

Any tips on preparation? Surviving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
luke8ball said:
Real Analysis will be the most rigorous, proof-based course I've taken for my math major, and I'm concerned because a lot of people at my school HATE the course.

Any tips on preparation? Surviving?

Well I loved the course. The very best thing you can do is get a great instructor. The other thing you can do is clear the decks in your life and plan on spending a lot of time on the course.

Anyone who hates real analysis wasn't cut out to be a math major. That's a fact. Engineering or physics, ok. But how can you love math but hate the rigorous study of the real numbers?
 
SteveL27 said:
Anyone who hates real analysis wasn't cut out to be a math major. That's a fact. Engineering or physics, ok. But how can you love math but hate the rigorous study of the real numbers?

It depends...
When I first looked at real analysis I hated it and most textbooks made it feel really unmotivated. Now that I know what I'm doing though it isn't that bad.

Any tips on preparation? Surviving?
Don't start with Rudin. Apostols analysis book is pretty nice, try that.
Examples make your own examples and get some kind of picture of what is going on and look for alternative definitions for things. Funnily enough I can't think of any off of the top of my head right now but I remember when I first looked at the subject the definitions of certain kinds of sets seemed really artificial and pointless but after looking through different textbooks and different sources I found some better (but equivelant) definitions that got to the point of what the set is.
Once you've got the sets part down the functions and sequences part of it isn't really that hard.
 
Thanks for the responses. Sounds like it's just a matter of seeing the bigger picture rather than getting caught up in any particular difficult definition.
 
I've never actually taken a course, but I've self studied it for about 7 months now. Granted, this is the only rigorous, proof based part of math I've ever done, but I've never enjoyed studying anything more than this.

I started with Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbott, then I moved on to Principles of Real Analysis by Aliprantis and Burkinshaw. The Aliprantis book is much harder than the Abbott one, but I've managed to work through about half of it on my own thanks to the excellent preparation I got by studying from Understanding Analysis first.

So if you want a book to prepare you for your Analysis course, I strongly recommend you get Understanding Analysis. Basically, if you're willing to put in hours and hours of work into understanding stuff you don't get, and into doing hard problems, you'll be fine.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top