Anyone want to take a look at this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullroar_86
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a nonuniform bar suspended by two cords at specific angles. Participants express confusion over differing answers for the distance from the left end of the bar to its center of mass, with one user consistently arriving at 2.19 while the provided answer is 2.93. There is a consensus that the equations used are correct, but the final answer given in the source may be a miscalculation. Clarification is sought on whether the discrepancy is due to an error in the problem statement or the calculations. Ultimately, the algebra appears sound, supporting the conclusion that the user's answer is accurate.
bullroar_86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a similar question to this, and I'm trying to figure out how it works. I think the answer here might be wrong.

It won't copy/paste right so here's the link

http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~gan/teaching/spring99/C13.pdf

A nonuniform bar of weight W is suspended
at rest in a horizontal position by two massless
cords. One cord makes the angle q = 36.9° with
the vertical; the other makes the angle f = 53.1°
with the vertical. If the length L of the bar is 6.10
m, compute the distance x from the left-hand end
of the bar to its center of mass.


When i plug in the values, I'm getting 2.19

the answer there is 2.93
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right, go ahead.
 
was that a sarcastic right? or a "it's right" right?

=P


The algebra seems to make sense, but I'm just not getting the same answer as them
 
I'm getting 2.19 as well by plugging in the numbers to the last equation given in the explanation. It's definitely possible that either the equation is written incorrectly or perhaps the answer given is simply wrong.
 
Eturnalblonde said:
I'm getting 2.19 as well by plugging in the numbers to the last equation given in the explanation. It's definitely possible that either the equation is written incorrectly or perhaps the answer given is simply wrong.


Yeah I am hoping the final answer was just a miscalculation on their part.

I've gone through the anwer step by step, and all the algebra looks good to me.
 
I generally supplement sarcasm with smileys. If it is a plain sentence then there is no sarcasm. Their equations are correct but your answer is right. (no smileys as you may find)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top