AP Calculus AB and BC: Appropriate Book?

AI Thread Summary
Richard Courant's Differential and Integral Calculus is a classic but may not fully prepare students for AP Calculus AB and BC due to its lack of specific AP exam strategies and tailored practice problems. While it covers many topics, a more modern textbook, like Michael Kelley's "Master the AP Calculus AB and BC Tests," is recommended for its readability and alignment with exam formats. Supplementing Courant's books with a comprehensive resource can enhance understanding and performance. Cost-effective options, including online resources, are also available. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual learning preferences and study needs.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

I was just wondering whether Richard Courant's Differential and Integral Calculus Volumes 1 and 2 would be appropriate for studying AP Calculus AB and BC. Would I be able to learn most of the topics covered in these courses just by using these books? I am asking this, because I do not want to spend money on big, modern, and expensive books.

Any replies would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My recommendation would be Michael Kelley's "Master the AP Calculus AB and BC Tests". It should sell for around $20 or less. (about $13.27 from Amazon.com plus shipping).

Michael Kelley's a lot more readable than the average author of math books.
 
for your question! The Richard Courant books are definitely a classic choice for studying calculus and have been used by many students over the years. However, AP Calculus AB and BC cover a wide range of topics and it is important to have a comprehensive and up-to-date textbook that covers all the material in a clear and organized manner. While the Courant books may cover most of the topics, they may not have the same level of detail and practice problems specifically tailored to the AP exams. Additionally, the AP exams often have multiple-choice questions and free response questions that require specific strategies and techniques, which may not be covered in the Courant books.

In my opinion, it would be beneficial to supplement the Courant books with a more modern and comprehensive textbook that is specifically designed for AP Calculus. This will ensure that you have all the necessary resources and support to fully prepare for the exams. While it may seem like a larger investment upfront, it will ultimately save you time and potentially improve your performance on the exams. Additionally, many schools and libraries have access to online resources and e-books, which can be a more cost-effective option.

Ultimately, the decision is up to you and your learning style. If you feel confident in your ability to navigate the material and supplement with additional resources, the Courant books may be a good choice. However, if you prefer a more structured and comprehensive approach, I would recommend investing in a modern textbook specifically designed for AP Calculus. Good luck with your studies!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top