Applicability of Bernoulli's principle to ideal gases

AI Thread Summary
Bernoulli's equation traditionally applies to incompressible fluid flow, raising questions about its applicability to ideal gases. The standard equation may not be suitable for ideal gases, as compressible fluid dynamics require a modified version that incorporates adiabatic effects and pressure coefficients. While some argue that ideal fluids can be treated as incompressible at subsonic speeds, this does not alter the fundamental equation of state governing gas behavior. The negligible compression effects in typical airflows around wings, often less than 5% at Mach 0.3, allow for the simplified Bernoulli equation to be used for practical estimations. Thus, while the standard equation can provide useful approximations, the compressible version is more accurate for ideal gases under varying conditions.
abeboparebop
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Bernoulli's equation as I understand it is an expression (or possibly a consequence) of conservation of energy in an incompressible fluid flow.

My question is: how can the "standard" Bernoulli's equation ever apply to an ideal gas?

Wikipedia gives a different version of Bernoulli's equation for a compressible fluid, which assumes adiabatic compression and has a coefficient with some gammas in front of the pressure term. Shouldn't this version always apply to an ideal gas fluid, and not the standard equation?

I understand that there are arguments that an ideal fluid basically doesn't significantly compress if it's significantly subsonic, but I don't see how these arguments affect the equation of state of the fluid, which is what tells us how the internal energy of the gas behaves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An ideal fluid can mean that the fluid has zero viscosity as well as being incompressable. The zero viscosity part makes flows indeterminate, since there is no interaction between adjacent flows. Assuming a constant mass flow within a pipe, the entire cross-section of fluid could be moving at some relatively slow speed, or you could have a very small tube of flow moving at some relatively high speed, while surrounding fluid is not moving at all.

The reference to significantly sub-sonic flows normally applies to real air flow around a typical wing. The amount of compression effect (change in density) of air around a typical wing is 5% or less at mach 0.3, and much lower at slower speeds, so it can be ignored if just trying to get a ball park estimate on flows, and use the simpler form of Bernoulli's equation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top