Application of Gauss' Laws: Large area parallel plate capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength inside a large area parallel plate capacitor with equal but opposite charges. The electric field is derived using Gauss' Law, resulting in the formula E = q/(A ε₀). When the positive charge is doubled, the electric field strength also doubles, leading to a 100% increase in the electric field. The calculation confirms that the effect of changing either charge (positive or negative) yields the same result for the electric field. This analysis highlights the uniformity of the electric field in such capacitors.
knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The plates of a large area parallel plate capacitor of area A are separated by a short
distance. The plates carry an equal but opposite charge \pm q.
(a) What is the electric field strength E(q,A) inside the capacitor?
(b) By how many percent does the electric field strength change if the positive charge is doubled?

Homework Equations



\oint\bf{E.n} dS = 4\pi k Q

Electric Field inside a capacator: E = \frac{Q}{A \epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution



the electric field inside a parallel plate capacator is uniform so it does not matter where we do the surface integral \oint\bf{E.n} dS
i choose to do the integral on a plane equal in area to the area of the capacators, i will call this area A.

(a)
\oint\bf{E.n} dS = 4\pi k Q = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}

E A = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}

E = \frac{q}{A \epsilon_0}

this is in agreement with the given formula i found.

(b) double the positive charge:

\oint\bf{E.n} dS = 4\pi k Q = \frac{2q}{\epsilon_0}

E = \frac{2q}{A \epsilon_0}

so this is twice that of in the first case. is this the right way to look at this? i thought what would be the difference if i changed the negative one instead, since in this solution i am ignoring the fact that there is a negative charge at all. i think that it would have the same effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the percent change can be worked out as:percent change = (\frac{2q}{A \epsilon_0} - \frac{q}{A \epsilon_0})/ \frac{q}{A \epsilon_0} * 100percent change = 100%
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top