Application of Noethers to Lorentz force Lagrangian with boost

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Noether's theorem to the Lorentz force Lagrangian under Lorentz boosts. The author derives two vector equations related to conserved quantities: one for boosts and another for spatial rotations. They note that their results encompass both spatial invariance and boost invariance due to not specifying the nature of the bivector for the rotational plane. The author acknowledges the complexity of the equations and the challenge of verifying their results without a reference solution. Overall, the exploration reveals deeper insights into the relationship between symmetries and conserved quantities in physics.
Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
I've been slowly self studying Lagrangian topics, and have gotten to Noether's theorem.

I've tried application of a Lorentz boost to all the terms in the Lorentz force Lagrangian (which is invariant with respect to boost since it has only four vector dot products). Then using Noether's theorem to find the invariant with respect to the boost rapidity I eventually end up with the following pair of vector equations:

<br /> - ct \frac{d (\gamma \mathbf{p})}{dt} + \mathbf{x} \frac{d (m c \gamma)}{dt} = \frac{q}{c} \frac{d \left( -ct \mathbf{A} + \phi \mathbf{x} \right) }{dt}<br />
<br /> \mathbf{x} \times \frac{d( \gamma \mathbf{p} )}{dt} = \frac{q}{c} \frac{d}{dt} \left( \mathbf{x} \times \mathbf{A} \right)<br />

I've made up the exersize for myself so I have no back of the book solutions to check against.

Has anybody seen something like this before, and if so did I get the right result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okay, thanks (that ascii thread is hard to read but at least my result is similar). I'll have to massage things to match them up more closely.

What I didn't realize until I read that is that my rotation wasn't fixed as either hyperbolic or euclidean since I didn't actually specify the specific nature of the bivector for the rotational plane. So I ended up with results for both the spatial invariance and the boost invariance at the same time. Oops;)

Of the six equations that generated the above

<br /> x^\mu v^\nu - x^\nu v^\mu = \frac{q}{mc} \frac{d}{d\tau} \left( A^\mu x^\nu - A^\nu x^\mu \right)<br />

the first vector equation above (taking space time indexes) is the conserved quantity for a boost, and the second for purely spatial indexes is the conserved quantity for spatial rotation. That makes my result seem more reasonable since I didn't expect to get so much only considering boost.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top