Applying least squares to measurement of nuclei masses and Q-value

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the least squares method in matrix form to determine the masses of nuclei A and B and the Q-value, given a specific difference in their measurements. There is skepticism about the assumption that this is a least squares problem, as the original attachment does not mention it. The mass of the emitted electron during beta decay is highlighted as a significant factor that may need to be considered in calculations. Additionally, the need for more context regarding the course or topic is emphasized, as the current setup may not be suitable for this type of inquiry. Clarifying these points could lead to more effective assistance in solving the problem.
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
See attached image.
Relevant Equations
Q-value: The difference in mass between the mother atom and the daughter atom.
Consider the problem in the attached image. The difference between A and B is 0.0020(20). How does one use the least squares method, particularly in matrix form, to find the best value of the masses of A and B respectively, as well as the Q-value? Aren't more measurements needed for the masses and the Q-value?

ls.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schniefen said:
.
How does one use the least squares method, particularly in matrix form, to find the best value of the masses of A and B respectively, as well as the Q-value? Aren't more measurements needed for the masses and the Q-value?

View attachment 274740
Hi. Since no one has yet replied, I thought I’d chip in

Some clarification may be needed:

1) Why do you assume this is a ‘least squares’ question? The attachment mentions nothing about least squares.

2) The question ignores the mass of the emitted electron (assuming ##{\beta}^-## decay). This mass is about 0.0005u, so it is not negligible relative to the Q-value. (The anti-neutrino’s mass will be negligible though.) It is unclear whether or not the electron’s mass needs to be accounted for.

3) It is not clear (to me anyway) what the ‘matrix calculations’ might be. My gut feel is that the question is about some clever statistical method to reconcile partially consistent values. If so, ‘Introductory Physics Homework Help’ might not be the optimum place to ask. Can you provide some context? What course/level/topic is this from?

4) One minor point. Note that you have omitted units for the masses, and the attachment has omitted units for Q.

If you can clarify points 1-3, you might have a better chance of receiving some help.

Season's Greetings!
 
  • Like
Likes schniefen
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top