Applying Stokes' Theorem in Spherical Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter BiGyElLoWhAt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
BiGyElLoWhAt
Gold Member
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
138
OK, so I know stokes theorem states that I can turn ##\int \int_{S}F\cdot dS## into ##\int \int (-P\frac{\partial g(x,y)}{\partial x} -Q\frac{\partial g(x,y)}{\partial y} + R)dxdy##

but I have a problem that I'm working on that's screaming change of variables (to spherical), but I'm not sure if I can apply stokes' this way...

my region is ##x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 64##, and I really want to make my region a spherical region (if possible, as I need to understand this for my final) but I'm not sure how to define g.

What's throwing me off is which partials to take. My F is ##<x,-y,z>## and upon making the proper substitutions, ##- \rho <cos(\theta )sin(\phi ), -sin(\theta )sin(\phi ), cos(\ phi)>##
and I suppose g would be ##\rho <cos(\theta )sin(\phi ), sin(\theta )sin(\phi ), cos(\ phi)>## , since that's my region? It's the region in the first quadrant oriented inwards, that's where the negative sign came from, I guess it should probably be in g, but either way it's going make it into the integral.

But now, how do I define my g and my partials? I understand P is my ##\hat{i}## and Q j and R z, but I'm uncertain as to which partials I'm multiplying by which functions.

I'm not sure if I can even do this, I'm just trying to understand this better. any help would be greatly appreciated =]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I didn't want to, but I watched the "how to" video, which basically works through the problem, and they ended up solving "g" for z, but I'm still wondering if there is a way to do this in spherical? Or do I need ##F = P\hat{\theta} + Q \hat{\phi} + R \hat{\rho}## in order to make this work like I'm wanting it to?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top