Approximate the minimum kinetic energy of an electron

AI Thread Summary
To approximate the minimum kinetic energy of an electron confined to a region the size of an atom (0.10 nm), the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) is essential. It establishes a relationship between the uncertainty in position and momentum, indicating that as the confined space decreases, the uncertainty in momentum increases. This leads to a minimum speed and, consequently, a minimum kinetic energy for the electron. The kinetic energy can be calculated using the equation E = (m_ev^2)/2, where v is derived from the uncertainty in momentum. Understanding these principles allows for a clearer grasp of quantum confinement effects on electron behavior.
ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Q: Approximate the minimum kinetic energy of an electron confined to a region the size of an atom (0.10 nm)

How would one go about solving this? What equations/principles are involved and how do we use them?

Seems like a simple question but i have no idea where to start? :confused:

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ussrasu said:
Q: Approximate the minimum kinetic energy of an electron confined to a region the size of an atom (0.10 nm)

How would one go about solving this? What equations/principles are involved and how do we use them?
Use the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle to determine the momentum of the electron. From that momentum, determine its kinetic energy.

AM
 
How does that work? I've asked this before. The HUP will give you the uncertainty in momentum in this case - i.e. the difference between the minimum and maximum momenta. I don't see how it gives you the actual minimum momentum.

If the electron has no probability of being found outside this confined region (i.e. an infinite well), then you can model it as having a potential energy of 0 inside and infinity outside. The minimum kinetic energy is then the total energy of the electron for the n = 1 state. However, that depends on an assumption not given by the OP.
 
El Hombre Invisible said:
How does that work? I've asked this before. The HUP will give you the uncertainty in momentum in this case - i.e. the difference between the minimum and maximum momenta. I don't see how it gives you the actual minimum momentum.

If the electron has no probability of being found outside this confined region (i.e. an infinite well), then you can model it as having a potential energy of 0 inside and infinity outside. The minimum kinetic energy is then the total energy of the electron for the n = 1 state. However, that depends on an assumption not given by the OP.
In order to contain a particle with mass m_e in a region of space of volume (\Delta x)^3, the uncertainty principle applies:

\Delta x \Delta p > \frac{\hbar}{2}

This means that the range of speed is given by:

\Delta v > \frac{\hbar}{2m_e\Delta x}

As \Delta x becomes very small, the uncertainty in its speed becomes very large. If the actual speed was known to be less than \Delta v while we knew that it was still confined to that space, the Uncertainty Principle would be violated. Therefore, the actual speed must be greater than \Delta v. This means that there is a minimum energy that the electron must have:

E = \frac{m_ev^2}{2} > \frac{\hbar^2}{8m_e\Delta x^2}

AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
If the actual speed was known to be less than \Delta v while we knew that it was still confined to that space, the Uncertainty Principle would be violated. Therefore, the actual speed must be greater than \Delta v.
Ahhhhh, of course! So obvious now it's been explained to me. So the HUP, as well as limiting the uncertainties, tells us that the maximum position is also given by \Delta x and the minimum momentum is given by \Delta p.

This is the second utterly simple and highly useful thing I've found out on PF in the last 16 hours that I haven't been taught. I should jack in uni and stay on PF 24/7.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top