Approximate uncertainty in area of circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the approximate uncertainty in the area of a circle with a radius of 5.3 * 10^4 cm. The area is initially calculated as 8.8 * 10^9 cm², and an assumed uncertainty of 0.1 * 10^4 cm is used to find the upper limit for the radius and area. A mistake in rounding leads to confusion about the correct expression of uncertainty in one significant figure. After reevaluation, the correct rounding reveals that the uncertainty should be expressed as 3 * 10^8 cm². The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful rounding and understanding the relationship between changes in radius and area.
chops369
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the approximate uncertainty in the area of a circle of radius 5.3 * 104 cm? Express your answer using one significant figure.


Homework Equations


A = pi*r2


The Attempt at a Solution


Using the given radius, I found the area to be 8.8 * 109 cm2.

And since the uncertainty is not given, I'm assuming that it's 0.1 * 104 cm.

Using this, the upper limit for the radius is 5.4 * 104 cm, which makes the upper limit for the area 9.2 * 109 cm2.

Subtracting 9.2 - 8.8 = 0.4 * 109 cm2. But this is apparently not the correct answer, and I can't figure out why. Unless I'm forgetting some fundamental aspect of significant figures, the only other way I can express this in one sig fig is to write out the actual number, i.e. 400000000; but this is also incorrect.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the area is A = pi*r2, then the difference in area is delta-A (sorry, I forgot all my latex). Can you relate delta-A to delta-r (the radius)? If you've taken calculus, then instead of delta-A it would be dA/dr.
 
I just figured it out.

Turns out it was a rounding error on my part, so what I rounded up to 4 * 108 should have actually been rounded down to 3 * 108.
 
chops369 said:
Using this, the upper limit for the radius is 5.4 * 104 cm, which makes the upper limit for the area 9.2 * 109 cm2.

That's the upper bound, now what's the lower bound?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top