Finding n for Arc Length of $\pi+e$ over Interval 0 to 6

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of n for the arc length of the function y=x^n over the interval from 0 to 6, the integral equation is set as ∫ from 0 to 6 of √(1-n²x²) dx = π + e. The integral evaluates to 3√(1 - 36n²) + (arcsin(6n))/(2n). Solving this equation for n analytically is challenging, but numerical methods can yield approximate solutions. The approximate value of n found is 10000000/162011025. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the reliance on numerical approximation techniques.
Trepidation
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
\int^{6}_{0} \sqrt{1-n^2x^2}dx=\pi+e


I need to solve this for n. I believe there should only be one possible function of the form y=x^n that gives an arclength of \pi+e over the interval x=0 to x=6, and wish to find the value of n that such a function must have.
Does anyone know how to do this? I haven't the slightest idea, as I only know as much calculus as I've managed to teach myself over the past few months... Thank you!


Ah, additionally, I'm assuming (as I, regrettably, read somewhere) that

\int^{b}_{a} \sqrt{1-[f'(x)]^2}dx

is equal to arclength (actually, I didn't just accept it completely--I lack the mathematics to evaluate whether or not it actually is such a formula, but my TI-89 is capable of calculating for whatever values I plug in so... They have thus far matched up perfectly with the values produced by the method I came up with myself:)

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\sum^{\frac{m}{x}-1}_{n=0}\sqrt{x^2+(f(x(n+1))-f(nx))^2}

Anyway, again, thank you.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well the integral is well-known, you'll get an arcsin and square root part so evaluating the integral isn't really a problem. I doubt though that you'll be able to solve for n analytically, after that - unless a numerical approximation would satisfy you.
 
Thank you, TD... Mm... Why not, and how would you get a numerical approximation?
 
The easy way, of course, would be relying on a computer program. I tried it with Mathematica.

Integration yields

\int\limits_0^6 {\sqrt {1 - n^2 x^2 } dx} = 3\sqrt {1 - 36n^2 } + \frac{{\arcsin \left( {6n} \right)}}<br /> {{2n}}

So what you want to solve for n is

3\sqrt {1 - 36n^2 } + \frac{{\arcsin \left( {6n} \right)}}<br /> {{2n}} = e + \pi
 
Last edited:
This is an interesting problem. I found that n is approx. 1000/16201, but I haven't found an elegant solution for n.
 
I refined my solution to:

n \approx {10000000 \over 162011025}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top