Are all Killing Vectors in 2D Spacetime Hypersurface Orthogonal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Messages
8,144
Reaction score
75
Just a quick question. Suppose we are considering a (1+1) spacetime. Are all vector fields hypersurface orthogonal? I think the answer is yes, since in the formula \xi_{[a}\partial_b \xi_{c]}, two indices will always be the same, which I think automatically makes the expression equal to zero, but am just seeking clarification!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct. In 2d, a vector field has a 'pretty unique' orthogonal direction (up to direction reversal). So use that orthogonal direction to integrate a curve from a starting point. That curve is the orthogonal 'hypersurface'. So you can visualize it geometrically as well.
 
Thanks, Dick. It's just this question I'm doing on an old exam paper. I've found a killing vector, and transformed into new coordinates so that it is of the form d/dt. The question then asks 'is this spacetime static'. Since the 2d metric is lorentzian, d/dt is clearly timelike => stationary. Then I calculated the hypersurface orthogaonality equation and saw that it was clearly satisfied, thus the spacetime is stationary, then thought about the situation and conjectured that all KV's in 2d are hypersurface orthogonal.

I just wanted to know I was right really, since this question will be on the exam, and saw this is a nice shortcut.

Anyway, thanks again for the help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top