Are All Non-Women Engineers? Investigating the Validity of a Subset Statement

blade123
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the following four statements concerning the student body at CU:
...
b) There are no women engineering students at CU
...

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



Let W be the set of all women
Let E be the set of all engineering students

W\subseteqE'

Therefore
W'\subseteqE

However I don't know valid the first, and therefore the second statement is. In the book I'm using, it doesn't cover any "not a subset" other than complimentary.

However, to conclude that all non-women are engineers seems fallacious. Or is that the point?

Is is valid to say:

W\subseteqE'


The set of all women are in the set of non-engineering students.

It's not really homework for a class, but is homework style.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top