Are amp-seconds the same as capacitance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamba88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
Amp-hours measure a battery's available charge, reflecting its capacity rather than capacitance. When batteries are connected in series, the voltage increases while the capacity rating (amp-hours) remains the same. The discussion clarifies that capacitance is not relevant to batteries, as they do not contain capacitors. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and relationships between current, time, and battery capacity. Overall, the focus is on distinguishing between amp-hours and capacitance in the context of battery configurations.
jamba88
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is an amp hour? Are they saying that batteries in series maintain the same capacitance when they say amp-hours?

When connecting your batteries in Series you are doubling the voltage while maintaining the same capacity rating (amp hours).

Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


None
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you know that ampères measure electrical current, right? So what do you get when you multiply electrical current by time?

Capacitance has nothing to do with it. (There are no capacitors involved in a battery)
 
Perhaps jamba meant capacity, not capacitance.

jamba88 said:

Homework Statement


What is an amp hour?
An amp-hour is a measure of a battery's available charge, which can be thought of as its capacity.

Are they saying that batteries in series maintain the same capacitance when they say amp-hours?
What have you been told about batteries and amp-hours from your class lectures or textbook?

When connecting your batteries in Series you are doubling the voltage while maintaining the same capacity rating (amp hours).

Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


None
Uh, technically you are supposed to attempt solving a homework problem before receiving help from us.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top